Anti-gravity, Futurism, particle physics, Randell Mills, technology

“Roads? Marty, where we’re going we don’t need roads!” :D Patent publication, Oct 11, 2018… ANTI-GRAVITY! :D (well the beginnings)… ‘Gamma Ray Electron Beam Transducer’

“Roads? Marty, where we’r.e going we don’t need roads!”… YOU KNOW IT! :’D

I have actually got a tear in my with this one :’) THE MUSIC!

Abstract
A method and means to produce a propulsion force comprises a source of electrons and means to produce pseudoelectrons. A gravitating body such as the Earth provides a repulsive (shite wording) fifth force on the pseudoelectrons. Pseudoelectrons are produced by absorption of high energy photons by electrons. The psuedoelectrons experience a fifth force (F2) away from the Earth and move upwards away from the Earth (‘GREAT SCOTT!’). To use this F2 device for propulsion, the repulsive fifth force on the psuedoelectrons is transferred to negatively charged plate. The Coulombic repulsion between the psuedoelectrons and the negatively charged plate causing the plate to lift. The craft (DELOREAN!) may additionally be imparted with angular momentum along an axis defined by the gravitational force, and the craft (DeLorean) may be tilted to move the vector away from the axis where a component of acceleration tangential to a surface of a gravitational body  is achieved via conservation of angular momentum.

GAMMA RAY ELECTRON BEAM TRANSDUCER! US Patent Application, published Oct 11 2018, Dr Randell L. ‘Doc’ Mills 😉

backto.jpg

TO ALL WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
BE IT KNOWN THAT Randell Lee ‘Doc’ Mills, a citizen of the United States of America and
resident of Coatesville, Pennsylvania has invented a certain new and useful improvement in
GAMMA-RAY ELECTRON BEAM TRANSDUCER
of which the following is a specification:

1. Field:
This disclosure relates to methods and apparatus for providing propulsion, in
particular methods and apparatus for providing propulsion using absorption of X-ray or gamma ray photons by free electron

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/94/00/e8/658d68368d29de/WO2017062488A2.pdf

Anti-gravity, astro-physics, cosmology, GUT-CP, physics, technology

Randell Mills could pave the way for intergalactic travel! (gravity and electromagnetism, ‘pseudo- electrons’, ‘the fifth force’… the BEGINNING of anti-gravity )

enterprise1
“It’s only the beginnings of anti-gravity technology… anti-gravity in it’s infancy… Mills has spent twenty years almost single headedly developing a brand new energy source, with almost no help from mainstream science…  but the theory for anti-gravity is there! It’s waiting to be developed… to be deployed!  😀
He has an unlimited energy source from the hydrogen atom, he has vast unknown compounds and materials with unknown properties yet to be fully understood and tested… and he has the beginnings of anti-gravity… … if you aren’t unbelievably turned on right now you must an absolute f*****g… Klingon!”

“Oh and he has his theories on Artificial Intelligence also! BOOM!”

enterpise!
“That is the logo it would have to have! And the first of the fleet would have to be named The Starship Mills! 😀 The second would be The Starship Holverstott”… “The Starship Woolsey?”… “Well that’s up to him innit!” ;D

Apparatus and method for providing an antigravitational force (1995)
Abstract
A method for producing an antigravitational force comprises an electron source (100) including electrons (113), an electron guide (109) for forming the electrons (113) to be negative curvature; the gravitation body (113) is comprised of matter of positive curvature where opposite curvatures provide a mutually repulsive antigravitational force. The electrons (113) are given negative curvature of an electron beam (113) from atoms such that negatively curved electrons (113) emerge. The emerging beam of negatively curved electrons (113) experience an antigravitational force. The antigravitational force of the electron beam (113) is transferred to a negative charged plate (121)

Fifth-force apparatus and method for propulsion (2007)
Classifications
B PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B64 AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
B64G COSMONAUTICS; VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT THEREFOR
B64G1/00 Cosmonautic vehicles
B64G1/22 Parts of, or equipment specially adapted for fitting in or to, cosmonautic vehicles
B64G1/40 Arrangements or adaptations of propulsion systems
B64G1/409 Unconventional spacecraft propulsion systems
Description
APPLICATION FOR LETTERS PATENT TO ALL WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
BE IT KNOWN THAT Randell Lee Mills, a citizen of the United States of America and resident of Princeton, New Jersey has invented a certain new and useful improvement in FIFTH-FORCE APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROPULSION of which the following is a specification:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention:
This invention relates to methods and apparatus for providing propulsion, in particular methods and apparatus for providing propulsion using a scattered electron beam at specific energies to create a fifth force on said electrons.

FIFTH-FORCE APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROPULSION
Oct 22, 2007
A method and means to produce a force for propulsion comprises a source of electrons and a means to produce hyperbolic electrons; whereas, a gravitating body such as the Earth provides a repulsive fifth force on the hyperbolic electrons. Hyperbolic electrons are produced by elastically scattering the electrons of an electron beam from atoms or molecules at specific energies. The emerging beam of hyperbolic electrons experiences a fifth force away from the Earth, and the beam moves upward (away from the Earth). To use this invention for propulsion, the repulsive fifth force on the hyperbolic-electron beam is transferred to a negatively charged plate. The Coulombic repulsion between the beam of hyperbolic electrons and the negatively charged plate causes the plate (and anything connected to the plate) to lift. The craft may additionally gain angular momentum from the fifth force along an axis defined by the gravitational force, and the craft may be tilted to move the vector away from the axis such that a component of acceleration tangential to the surface of a gravitating body is achieved via conservation of the angular momentum.

enterprise

NOTE: This is only a theory, and has yet to be tested. The foundations for future research have been laid by Mills’ GUT-CP, but as of yet Randell Mills has concentrated specifically on hydrino research. He’s saved the planet with hydrino energy, and laid the foundation for future intergalactic explorers… 😀

I shall return to update this post, but in short Mills has a theory of harnessing ‘the fifth force’. His theory has from the beginning talked about the connection between gravity and electromagnetism, and he theorises that a ‘pseudo-electron’ could be created that will repel gravitational forces. In 2015, Mills performed an experiment indicating the existence of ‘pseudo-electrons’ at precisely the energies predicted. Mills calculations derived the strength of ‘the fifth force’ to be around one trillion times than Earth’s gravity.

anti1anti2anti3
Photos from 2006 (SIGNED!) edition of The Grand Unified Theory Of Classical Quantum Mechanics (Blacklight Power)The title is now The Grand Unified Theory Classical Physics (Brilliant Light Power), and a free updated version can be download at Millsian.com

anti4.jpg
Randell Mills and The Search for Hydrino Energy (Brett Holverstott)

Chapter 35. The Fifth Force
Page 1557
https://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/theory/GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Volume3-Web-091217.pdf

cosmology, GUT-CP

Possible confirmation of Mills’ ‘Oscillating Universe’ and GUT-CP model? (remnants of a prior Universe)

“I actually emailed Roger Penrose with this last year.”
“Did you get a response?”
“No… but then he is ‘Sir’ Roger Penrose, and what we know of the Queens Knighthood list, is it reads like a God damn sex offen..
“Drop it Danny Boy!”

Planck-CMB-635x318

Recent observations made by both the Planck observatory and the BICEP2 South Pole telescope, indicate possible remnants of a previous Universe. This possible indication has been interpreted by a number of physicists in different ways, but Roger Penrose of Oxford University believes what is being seen in the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data, are radioactive swirls dubbed ‘Hawking Holes’, thus being proof of a previous Universe existing prior to this present one, in what he and his colleagues call the “conformal cyclic cosmology” (CCC).
(It is worth noting these conclusions are drawn mainly from the data from the Planck observatory, and raw data from the BICEP2 is still to be released)

Radioactive swirls in the cosmos may rewrite the origin story of the universe
“The idea is called “conformal cyclic cosmology” (CCC), and what it asserts is that, rather than starting from a big bang, the universe continually expands and contracts, each time leaving behind tiny bits of electromagnetic radiation that remain as the process occurs over and over. The late Stephen Hawking predicted tiny dots of radiation, which others call ‘Hawking points’, left over from this cycle.”

These Swirls of Light Could Be Signs of a Previous Universe Existing Before Ours
“Penrose’s CCC model was developed as an answer to a curious imbalance between measurements of our early Universe’s temperature and the state of order we might expect.
According to him, this imbalance could be accounted for by the death of a pre-existing universe that was there before the Big Bang. Oscillating universes come in a few different forms, depending on your choice of model. Some suggest the Universe is destined to fall back in itself one day.”
bicep_mode_signal_swirls_of_light_1024

This observation, and it’s interpretation caught my attention, because according to Mills’ GUT-CP, we live in an ‘Oscillating Universe’, eternally expanding and contracting over a period of a trillion years or so (give or take). According to Mills, the Universe is in a continual state of expansion from 9 billion light years to 312 billion light years, and then contraction phase back (every 450 billion years). This process happens because, during expansion phase (or ‘annihilation’), matter is converted directly into energy (through various ‘hydrino’ chemical and nuclear processes throughout the Universe, including our own Sun), which causes spacetime to expand everywhere throughout the Universe.

NOTE – Dr Randell Mills successfully predicted the acceleration of the expanding Universe in his model prior to it’s discovery. He was also the first to successfully predict gravitational waves in to his model.

After the Universe has expanded to it’s peak radius (312 billion light years), and the engines of the expansion phase have ‘run out’ so to speak (stars, supernovas, neutron stars etc.), and most of the Universes matter has been converted into energy… the Universe will then begin it’s contraction phase and the process is reversed. Radiation will create particles, which in turn create atoms, converting ‘dark energy’ into matter, thus contracting spacetime everywhere throughout the Universe.

“The conversion of matter into energy causes spacetime, and thus the universe, to expand, since light has inertial but no gravitational mass. The acceleration of the expansion of the presently observed universe was predicted by Mills in 1995 and has since been confirmed experimentally. Mills predicts that the universe expands and contracts over thousand-billion year cycles.” – Brilliant Light Power

hydrinoexpansionuniverse
Brett Holverstott ‘Randell Mills and the Search for Hydrino Energy’ Pg 283… Pg. 288 “Mills’s universe did not start with a bang. It may have structures that predate the beginning of the expansion by many billions of years.”

It is important to note that The Big Bang Theory is just that… a theory, and no direct evidence for it has ever been put forward. The idea was based upon the fact that the Universe was expanding (prior to knowledge of it’s acceleration, which should in turn discount the theory). Many physicists and cosmologists throughout the 20th century questioned the theory, and by early 21st century a vast array of evidence has slowly accumulated to discount it.

– Reiss 1998. Hubble date showed that the Universe was NOT decelerating as predicted by the Big Bang Theory, but actually accelerating. Unknown to most in science, Mills had successfully predicted this two years prior in GUT-CP model. (this is when the idea of ‘dark’ matter’ came to the forefront of physics in order to account for this surprising observation).

– Space Circles Are Proof of a Pre-Big Bang Universe? (2010) Recycled-universe theory “works on paper,” but details missing, critics say.cmb– 3 Theories That Might Blow Up the Big Bang (Steinhardt and Turok)
“Steinhardt and Turok—working closely with a few like-minded colleagues—have now developed these insights into a thorough alternative to the prevailing, Genesis-like view of cosmology. According to the Big Bang theory, the whole universe emerged during a single moment some 13.7 billion years ago. In the competing theory, our universe generates and regenerates itself in an endless cycle of creation. The latest version of the cyclic model even matches key pieces of observational evidence supporting the older view.”
“We weren’t looking for cycles,” Steinhardt says, “but the model naturally produces them.” After a collision, energy gives rise to matter in the brane worlds. The matter then evolves into the kind of universe we know: galaxies, stars, planets, the works. Space within the branes expands, and at first the distance between the branes (in the bulk) grows too. When the brane worlds expand so much that their space is nearly empty, however, attractive forces between the branes draw the world-sheets together again. A new collision occurs, and a new cycle of creation begins. In this model, each round of existence—each cycle from one collision to the next—stretches about a trillion years. By that reckoning, our universe is still in its infancy, being only 0.1 percent of the way through the current cycle.
The cyclic universe directly solves the problem of before. With an infinity of Big Bangs, time stretches into forever in both directions. “The Big Bang was not the beginning of space and time,” Steinhardt says. “There was a before, and before matters because it leaves an imprint on what happens in the next cycle.”

– As these Forbes articles explain, it is now accepted amongst theoreticians that a singularity within the Big Bang Model is an impossibility within mathematics and the laws of physics.
There Was No Big Bang Singularity
The Big Bang Wasn’t The Beginning, After All

– As Holverstott states in ‘Randell Mills and the search for Hydrino energy’, numerous ‘ancient’ structures are being discovered throughout the Cosmos that seem to predate the accepted 13.6 billion years ‘beginning’.
~Including a ‘quasar that is 13 billion light years away, yet powered by a black hole about 2 billion times the mass of the Sun’ (Mortlock 2011).
~A star smaller than our own Sun, which has almost no trace of elements heavier than hydrogen or helium, with a ratio of helium lower than that theoretically created in the big bang. Dubbed ‘The Star That Should Not Exist’ (which is so sweet! :D)

eso1132a
“Hi! I’m SDSS J102915+172927, in the constellation Leo (The Lion), I’m older than 13 billion years and everyone says I shouldn’t have come into existence in the first place… WELL FUCK YOU!… … What do want? A picture?” 😀

– More recently a gargantuan black hole found in 2013, again throws doubt upon the notion of nothing in our ‘known’ Universe existing prior. I believe many more objects and structures will be found in the coming years and decades that will support Mils’ GUT-CP and his ‘Oscillating Universe’ Model.blackholequasar.png
– Young black hole had monstrous growth spurt
Super-massive object found in early Universe tests theories of cosmic evolution.
“A black hole that grew to gargantuan size in the Universe’s first billion years is by far the largest yet spotted from such an early date, researchers have announced. The object, discovered by astronomers in 2013, is 12 billion times as massive as the Sun, and six times greater than its largest-known contemporaries. Its existence poses a challenge for theories of the evolution of black holes, stars and galaxies, astronomers say.”

Mills model of an Oscillating Universe is NOT to be confused with other models such as the Big Bounce or CCC, which are still based in Quantum Models such as string or M theory… this is a truly original, more eloquent and simpler model, that has been arrived at through a classical understanding of atomic structure and gravitational forces (i.e hydrino model).
For further details see…
Summary Of Randell Mills’s Unified Theory (Holverstott)

and of course Randell Mills’ explanation itself in ‘The Grand Unified Theory Of Classical Physics, Volume III – Collective Phenomena, High Energy Physics, & Cosmology’
(Ch. 32.7 to 32.9.5 Cosmology, The Expanding Universe and Microwave , The Period of Background, The Period Of Oscillation etc.)
gut-cpvol3