Climate Change, Environment, Evolution, Futurism, Global Warming, GUT-CP, hydrino, HydrinoEconomy, Life, Philosophy, physics, Planet Earth, Randell Mills, SunCell, technology, Terraforming

Futurist Dr. Randell Mills Talks SunCell, Off-Grid Power, And The Future Of Job Creation (Huffington Post 2017)

“‘Futurist’?… i.e. someone who actually gives a shit about tomorrow? Cares about  the fate of their own species?… Someone who isn’t infanticidal? :/
My philosophy when it comes the future of humanity is quite simple… if you aren’t down for creating a world free of tyranny, a civilisation in harmony with nature and the laws of nature, where every man, woman and child is free to prosper and pursue their own interests with no burdens or restrictions… … FUCK OFF AND FIND ANOTHER ONE!… … … I’m like Jor-El” 😀

future25

“the applications of limitless unbounded energy are only constrained by human imagination, ingenuity and ambition” – Dr Randell Mills

Futurist Dr. Randell Mills Talks SunCell, Off-Grid Power, And The Future Of Job Creation

Jobs, Musk…Mills? Every now and then, a revolutionary thinker imagines a future the rest of us can’t, or in the case of Randell Mills, imagines technology that defies the laws of quantum mechanics. Initially mocked, Jobs retains a godlike status, even posthumously. And Musk, well, he’s proved skeptics wrong for years, and yet his talk of Hyperloop Pods traveling at hundreds of miles per hour under the streets of L.A. seems like fantasy to many.

Future-London-Futuristic-City-Future-Architecture-Simon-Kennedy-Factory-Fifteen-01
London! 😀

If there is one thing I’ve learned from working for and alongside hundreds of entrepreneurs over the last two decades it is this: pay attention to big thinkers whose ideas presently seem unimaginable, especially when these thinkers are determined to transform the world.

Give me the chance to connect with them personally, and I’m all in.

Not without his own skeptics, I recently had the chance to sit down with Mills and hear about his latest invention, the Sun Cell, which promises to bring clean and cheap energy to the world. As we chatted, I found myself imagining the possibilities and the potential. Lifting millions from poverty? Check. Tackling climate change. Check again.

future
Paris! 😀

Mills says the SunCell works by generating electricity with hydrogen being converted to dark matter by using water in the air, and the reaction packs 200 times the energy of burning conventional gasoline. Sound too good to be true? Well, Mills is betting SunCell will soon be commercialized, and strategic investors are backing that bet. Brilliant Light Power (which Mills founded in 1991), has raised $120M to date and has recently completed a $20M funding round.

Imagine living in a world where the grid does not exist and where everyone has access to power, no matter who you are or what part of the world you live. That would be something else.

061018_KAEC_Crystal Renderings.indd
Toronto! 😀

Rebekah Iliff: Do you consider yourself an inventor, an innovator, an entrepreneur, a social entrepreneur, or a futurist?

Randell Mills: All of the above. To do what I do, you not only need to be an inventor and a theorist but also have a firm comprehension of how to make things work in practice. When your goal is nothing less than delivering a power source greater than fire, your only choice is to be multi-faceted. Otherwise, you’re just making incremental improvements, not holistic leaps forward. High-energy dark-matter power as a business seems totally impractical. It is barely fathomable, so you’ve got to tackle theory, innovation, invention, and practical business simultaneously.

RI: You are a trained medical doctor. Why did you choose to focus on energy?

RM: If you look broadly at science and technology, one thing is ultimately connected to another, and energy just naturally called to me. In fact, I’ve invented in a number of different areas, including hydrogen energy technology, computational chemical design, magnetic resonance imaging, drug delivery, artificial intelligence and more. But there’s really no better opportunity to work on something that could be so profoundly disruptive.

future2
I don’t know! … Liverpool? 😀

“The ramifications of bringing cheap and clean energy to the world are transformational. Ultimately, I’m working to change our perception of the universe. So instead of having tunnel vision into a single aspect of quantum theory, I had to become a cross disciplinarian.” – Dr. Randell Mills

future3
Astana, Kazakhstan! I recognise the mall ‘Khan Shatyrr’ 😉 

RI: Explain the SunCell for dummies.

RM: It’s a massive lightbulb that is on 24/7 and produces cheap and clean energy from the hydrogen atoms of water. It’s lit by a reaction between of hydrogen of water molecules to dark matter using the humidity in the air as the water source. It’s over 1000 times as powerful as high-octane gasoline, and the power is directly converted to electricity using photovoltaic cells.

RI: What does the world look like when you’ve commercialized the SunCell?

RM: Everything will be powered by the SunCell. Solar, wind, bio fuels, and nuclear will all be replaced. The grid will be unnecessary. Utilities will be unnecessary. There would be no pollution and limited energy regulation. As the SunCell is fully autonomous, energy delivery becomes impervious to disruption from war, terror, and natural disaster. Importantly, underdeveloped countries will have the same potential lifestyle and productivity as the developed world. Each SunCell could also serve as a self-powered, autonomous node in a mesh network that could replace the Internet.

future12

future11
Detroit!

RI: How would it impact jobs?

RM: Jobs are created by wealth. If you have something that encourages productivity, then there will be jobs. The SunCell encourages productivity by leveling and equally distributing the energy playing field for virtually anyone, anywhere. There is literature about GDP and energy dependency, and it’s very revealing in terms of how dependent we are on power.

RI: I know a lot of folks at your level would let ego get in the way. How do you stay grounded?

future5
That’s Manchester that! Northern Quarter

RM: My background is helpful. I didn’t come from the Ivy League. Most people in my life were not Harvard or MIT graduates. They weren’t captains of industry. They were honest and worked hard. I grew up on a farm in Cochranville, Pennsylvania, where life was very challenging and humbling. You earned an appreciation for dangerous equipment at an early age. I’ve interacted with all types of people from every stature in life, and I’ve always maintained that simple farmer’s perspective.

RI: What is your PR strategy around this? How do you plan on shifting the public opinion enough to override business as usual?

RM: We have a multi-pronged approach. We’re introducing state-of-the-art theory, science, and technology that astonishes experts with quantifiable and verifiable results in multiple scientific and technological fields, and we are building a machine with a story behind it that blows everyone else away. Within a couple months we should be ready to show its commercial potential.

RI: Any parting thoughts you’d like to share?

RM: I think the next “age” is an age where mankind has a manual of the universe and knows exactly how the universe works. We then begin to create previously unimaginable inventions by applying this manual and the newly discovered laws that come along with it. The next big future is the physical age.

future6
Hackney, East London

“Practically speaking, I think that beyond SunCell, visionaries like Elon Musk will introduce entirely new technologies that people haven’t even conceived of. The pace will only increase in the coming years, as we will see similar types of disruptive and enabling technologies come to market.” – Dr. Randell Mills

 

 

“I Googled ‘Future Jerusalem’… erm?” :/

CIA, cosmology, Environment, GUT-CP, hydrino, Nikola Tesla, physics, Randell Mills, SunCell, technology

ARTICLE – Randell L. Mills – A Living Legend, Greater Than Einstein and Tesla Combined (The Tesla scenario… It will NOT happen again!)

“History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes” – attributed to Mark Twain, but source unknown
“Well, I’m going to ensure that the track is changed!” – Daniel Hurley

Not many individuals in this line of inquiry compare Randell Mills to Nikola Tesla, but the comparisons are there (which is why I am highly suspicious of CIA involvement, and investments from certain institutions). The story of Dr Randell Mills is unprecedented in history, and for various sociological and philosophical reasons it is still being ignored. Nikola Tesla should have gone down in history as the greatest scientist/inventor of the 20th century. He had unlocked the secrets of ‘free energy’, his work could have paved the way for a new course for technological human civilisation, and he should be being taught in every school and University on the planet today…. … but ‘the powers that be’ sanitized him from history. Only now are a small number of people realising the significance of this mans contributions to 20th century science… THIS WILL NOT HAPPEN WITH RANDELL MILLS! Not in the 21st century, the age of the internet, and not as long as I’m alive… I will dedicate my life to ensuring this mans work, his inventions and his contributions to our understanding of the atom, of the Universe, and of reality, WILL become mainstream textbook taught science.

My children will be taught Dr. Randell Mills’ Grand Unified Theory Of Classical Physics… … ALL CHILDREN WILL!

Randell L. Mills – A Living Legend, Greater Than Einstein and Tesla Combined

by Michael Suede • July 12, 2016
Being alive at the end of the twentieth century here on planet Insanity has afforded us a few special privileges in the observance of human history. We’ve seen the birth of the microprocessor, the creation of the internet, and other technological marvels that have vastly improved the quality of the human condition for billions of people.

Unfortunately, even with all of our modern technological advancements, there’s still a huge number of people living in extreme poverty. Most of the poverty can be directly linked to a lack of cheap and abundant energy. According to the IEA, “Modern energy services are crucial to human well-being and to a country’s economic development; and yet globally 1.2 billion people are without access to electricity and more than 2.7 billion people are without clean cooking facilities. More than 95% of these people are either in sub-Saharan African or developing Asia, and around 80% are in rural areas.”

Even in many places with access to power, it’s not cheap enough or abundant enough to lift the population above the poverty line. Access to energy is the defining limit on the ability of any given population to pull itself out of poverty by increasing its productive capacity.

All real wealth comes from the ground. Wealth starts as raw materials that are transformed by human intervention into usable goods that improve the quality of the human condition. Extracting and transforming resources from the planet takes a tremendous amount of energy. The cheaper and more abundant the energy resources at our disposal, the cheaper and easier it is to extract and transform resources; which ultimately means cheaper and more abundant goods and services for all of humanity.
For most of human history, the energy to transform resources has come from our own manual labor, the leverage of simple manual tools, and of course – fire. Even today, we live in what could still broadly be categorized as the combustion age. We use combustion to produce the vast majority of energy on the planet, and it’s still by far the cheapest means of producing energy yet available to man. We burn coal and oil to power our homes and factories, we burn gasoline to power our cars and planes, we burn crude oil to power our tankers and shipping; it’s all a big bloody burning mess.

Numerous wars and insurrections have been fought over the control of energy resources, and all the while, the power grid acts as a control grid that forces massive swaths of people to herd together into compact concrete jungles. The human condition on planet Insanity is so intimately linked with the production of power that we use the same word to describe everything from politics to finance to the performance of an engine – Power.

Imagine what the planet would look like if every person had access to a compact generator that was capable of providing enough energy to power a small factory, while requiring no fuel, producing no pollution, requiring virtually no maintenance for decades, and being portable enough to fit in a small vehicle. It’s hard to fathom because the potential for invention and mobility becomes nearly limitless. People could live comfortably in the middle of the ocean or in the middle of the Alaskan wilderness, it wouldn’t make a bit of difference. Homes could be flying recreational vehicles that never have to land. Cars could be airplanes and airplanes could be transformed into space vehicles. With such an invention, we could even colonize the inner planets of the solar system.

With such an invention, the power grid becomes obsolete. Humans become untethered to the entire utility grid, water and sewage included. Water could be pulled from the air or desalinated from the oceans. Trash and sewage could be incinerated on demand. Unlimited personal power brings with it virtually limitless potential. Unlimited personal power brings with it virtually limitless freedom.

I’m telling you now that such an invention exists, and in the next year or so, it’s going to change the face of humanity forever.

Dr. Randell L. Mills, a Harvard trained medical doctor, who developed this generator and the physical theory behind it, will be remembered throughout the remainder of human history as the single greatest being to ever have lived. A billion trillion years from now, people will still be discussing his theories and his invention. Mills invention is no less transformative than the discovery of fire. It’s a far greater achievement than the combustion engine or the telephone.

In one fell swoop, Mills will have overturned the standing theories of physics, dismantled the power grid, put an end to virtually all air pollution, put an end to poverty, put an end to wars over energy resources, opened up the entire planet to human habitation, put a serious dent in the ability of politics to control people, and saved limitless lives in the future due to a lack of power.

To be alive at the same time as Mills is a cosmic treat. The man is a living legend that has yet to be recognized. Like all great transformative scientists before him, academia has viciously attacked him, his theories and his company, on both a personal and professional level. Mills is truly the modern day Galileo. Like Mills, Galileo was viciously attacked by academia for his ideas, even though they are basis for all modern science today, to the point where Galileo spent the last days of his life under house arrest for scientific heresy.

Here’s what mainstream science has had to say about Mills and his work. I feel compelled to copy and paste this here for posterity, because once Mills’ generator hits the market, these comments are sure to be flushed down the memory hole. Brilliant Light Power (formerly Black Light Power) is the name of Mills’ company that’s producing the generator and doing the research. The following is taken from Brilliant Light Power’s wiki page, which Brilliant Light obviously has no control over (think about that for a minute, a company that’s prohibited from editing it’s own wiki page highlights just how terrified academics are of Mills and his theories):

Robert L. Park
Since 1999 Robert L. Park, emeritus professor of physics at the University of Maryland and a notable skeptic, has been particularly critical of BLP. In 2008 Park wrote:
“BlackLight Power (BLP), founded 17 years ago as HydroCatalysis, announced last week that the company had successfully tested a prototype power system that would generate 50 KW of thermal power. BLP anticipates delivery of the new power system in 12 to 18 months. The BLP process,[35]discovered by Randy Mills, is said to coax hydrogen atoms into a “state below the ground state”, called the “hydrino.” There is no independent scientific confirmation of the hydrino, and BLP has a patent problem. So they have nothing to sell but bull shit. The company is therefore dependent on investors with deep pockets and shallow brains.” – Park[36]
Steven Chu
In 1999, Steven Chu, Nobel Laureate in Physics in 1997, said “it’s extremely unlikely that this is real, and I feel sorry for the funders, the people who are backing this”.[7]

Phillip Anderson
In 1999, Princeton University’s physics Nobel laureate Phillip Anderson said of it, “If you could fuck around with the hydrogen atom, you could fuck around with the energy process in the sun. You could fuck around with life itself.” “Everything we know about everything would be a bunch of nonsense. That’s why I’m so sure that it’s a fraud.”[6]

Wolfgang Ketterle
Wolfgang Ketterle, a professor of physics at MIT, said BLP’s claims are “nonsense” and that “there is no state of hydrogen lower than the ground state”.[8]

Michio Kaku
Michio Kaku, a theoretical physicist based at City University of New York, adds that “the only law that this business with Mills is proving is that a fool and his money are easily parted.”[6] and that “There’s a sucker born every minute.”[7]

Peter Zimmerman
While Peter Zimmerman was chief arms-control scientist at the State Department, he stated that his department and the Patent Office “have fought back with success” against “pseudoscientists” and he railed against, among other things, the inventors of “hydrinos.”[37]

Forbes attacked him, saying, “This case has many things in common with other failed new energy technologies, including a charismatic leader who generates lots of press, claims of academic validation and criticism of expert skepticism, ample fundraising, and frequent reports of interest from potential buyers. What you don’t find are actual ongoing operation of a power plant outside of demonstration models controlled by the promoter.”

The IEEE attacked him, calling him a loser. And of course, countless internet trolls have attacked him and his company over all the scientific forums scattered across the internet. People have been banned simply for posting about Mills and his theories on sites like physicsforums.com and the Reddit science boards. You can’t even discuss his theories on the major science forums without risking an immediate ban.

Academics typically don’t even bother commenting on theories that have no scientific merit, so when you see this level of vitriol over Mills’ theories, it stands to reason it’s being driven by fear, not by a genuine motivation to seek the truth.

I’ve stated numerous times on this site over the past decade that modern physics is fundamentally flawed. It is not tied to reality. Mills theory takes physics back to its roots. It does away with all the imaginary particles and nonsense that make up the basis of quantum mechanics. Mills theory is based on closed form classical physics, which treats the electron as singular entity that can be modeled and calculated in precise detail. Mills theory allows for the precise calculation of molecular shapes and bond strengths, and will transform the way material sciences are conducted in the future.

Taking away all the imaginary particles and physics demystifies quantum mechanics. With Mills’ theory, theoretical physicists are no longer needed, and their positions as the high priests of science are directly threatened. It’s little wonder they hate Mills so much. Eventually the theoretical people will be shunted to the side like most religions have been today. Make no mistake, theoretical physics is a religion, not a science. It’s incredibly hard to change people’s’ religious view points since they aren’t based on evidence or logical reasoning.

To put Mills work in perspective, the Tokamak ITER fusion reactor has had 14 billion dollars of public funding thrown at it with no results to show for it. Further, to quote wiki, “the ITER is not designed to produce electricity, but made as a proof of concept reactor for the later DEMO project.” So 14 billion just to build a proof-of-concept.
Mills has taken less than 100 million of private investment capital over less time than the ITER to go from theory, to concept, to design, and now on to actual power production, with less than a tenth of the resources. Further, the ITER will obviously be abandoned after Mills generator goes into production, resulting in 14 billion dollars of public money being flushed down the toilet to feed the pocket books of academics and state contractors. The academics and contractors are the real scam artists in this melodrama. Perhaps that’s another reason they attack Mills with such ferocity, they are having a bit of Freudian projection going on within themselves.

So let’s talk a little bit about the generator itself. In simple terms, it works by reacting a very tiny amount of hydrogen with a silver catalyst and then exposing that reaction to an electrical discharge. When the hydrogen, silver and electrical discharge combine, the hydrogen atoms shrink, releasing a tremendous amount of energy in the process. Using Mills process, a gallon of water has the same energy potential of around 2000 gallons of gasoline. The amount of hydrogen needed is so small that the generator can pull the hydrogen it needs from water in the surrounding air. This enormous release of energy is then used to basically form the filament of a carbon light bulb.

The carbon light bulb glows so brightly from the heat that it reaches the equivalent brightness of over 2000 suns, with the potential to go even higher in the future. The light bulb is surrounded by an array of special solar cells called concentrator solar cells that are able to harness the energy from this enormously bright light source. These special solar cells already exist and are in use in solar farms around the world today.

Mills is projecting his initial generators to produce around 150 kw of power, with the potential for much higher amounts in the future, and the ability to chain multiple units together to provide huge amounts of power. He projects around 600 or so dollars per unit in materials costs to produce the unit, with the unit weighing far less than a conventional gasoline engine at around the same size. He also says production of the units can be scaled up to near infinite capacity, allowing a tremendous number of these units to be produced for next to nothing, using the same format as current LED production uses today.
Mills already has the “light bulb” portion of this generator fully prototyped and working. Obviously that’s the hard part since the rest of the parts for the generator already exist from off-the-shelf suppliers. Mills is projecting production units to be ready for delivery by the second half of 2017, with a fully prototyped working generator ready for field testing by the first half of 2017. Once Mills rolls out that first generator, be prepared for a monumental media shit storm to hit the public.

You can read the latest press release from Brilliant Light Power here, and watch the “light bulb” in action below.

I’ve been following BLP closely for nearly a decade now. I’m convinced Mills is the real deal. Contrary to what Forbes claims, numerous independent labs have verified his claims. He’s obtained funding from some of the wealthiest people on the planet, and he’s got a highly skilled team of engineers backing him. He doesn’t need any more investment capital so he’s got no reason to lie. Several university labs and independent investigators have replicated and validated Mills work:

Rowan University’s report
Rowan University’s report II
UNC Asheville’s report
University of Illinois report

It’s also worth taking a look at Brilliant Light’s board of directors. These people don’t strike me as the type of people who are willing to throw their lives away over fraud charges:

H. McIntyre Gardner’s profile from Bloomberg:
Chairman of Spirit Airlines
Chairman of Merrill Lynch Bank USA
Chairman of Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company and Transamerica Advisors Life Insurance Company of New York
Director of Isola Group, SARL
President of the Board of Trustees at the Princeton Charter School

James E. Canty J.D.’s profile from Bloomberg:
President and General Counsel at Clough Capital Partners
Associate General Counsel, Corporate Secretary, and Director of Investor Relations at Converse Inc.
Corporate and Securities Lawyer at Goldstein & Manello
Certified Public Accountant at KPMG

John J. Gillen’s profile from Bloomberg:
Global Director of Finance at Towers Perrin
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Dayton Power and Light Co.
Partner, PricewaterhouseCoopers
Member of the Office of the Chief Accountant of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Jeremy Hux’s article from Yahoo Finance:
Managing director and global head of clean technology investment banking for Credit Suisse
President of HCP Advisors
Head of West Coast Clean Technology for Morgan Stanley

Barbara A. Nabial’s profile from Bloomberg:
Senior Audit Manager with Deloitte & Touche

And let’s not forget Mills, who has a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Chemistry, summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa from Franklin & Marshall College, and a Doctor of Medicine Degree from Harvard Medical School. He also did graduate engineering coursework at MIT.

At this point, it doesn’t matter what anyone may say about him. He’s going to market, and he’s going to change the world.

If you’d like to learn more about the backstory to Mills incredible scientific achievement, a book on the subject was recently released by one of his former employees.

Update 10/28/16:

Pretty crazy update from BLP today.

They refactored the SunCell to use dual liquid silver metal injectors for the electrodes, which solved the problem of the reaction being so strong that it was blowing holes through solid tungsten electrodes in just a few seconds.

What’s pretty crazy is they are reporting that they can actually shut the power off to the electrodes and the EM pump; yet the reaction will continue in a self-sustaining manner. You can actually see this take place in the video.

BLP states, “It is predicted that with sufficient silver vapor pressure, the power will persist by a self-sustaining hydrino reaction. Moreover, as designed, when the cell is operated as a silver boiler, the EM pump power may be terminated as well such that the parasitic load is zero except for the power consumed in electrolysis of water to provide the hydrogen fuel. In fact, the power did persist at the same level for long duration after the ignition power was terminated (See sections of the run indicated by the ignition-off video captions).”

Here’s a look at the reactor:
reactor1
reactor2

Update 11/2/2016:

I just read through the latest BrLP presentation event notes and found their current planned development and production timeline. They are projecting the commercial units to produce 100 kW of power.

BrLP has contracted with Columbia Tech to have them do the prototype and manufacturing workups. CT’s Chief Technology Officer is projecting initial field testing of prototype units to take place in 6 months, with pilot commercial units available 6 months after initial field testing completes. Phase 1A design began on November 1st.

Masimo Semiconductor is responsible for creating the commercial photovoltaic converter comprising a denser receiver array of concentrator multijunction photovoltaic cells that will wrap around the black-body light source. Masimo’s Head of Business Development is projecting the photovoltaic array to be ready for the prototype field tests on time.

Looking at the slide notes from Masimo, they are projecting 15.5kW output for the first prototype, and 28.5kW for the second prototype.~

Here’s Masimo’s published timeline:

-Week 1: July 27, 2016…. Masimo Semi currently under TPV Cell contract and drawings
-Week 10: Oct 19, 2016…..Masimo Semi currently under gDRA prototype development contract
-Week 14: Nov 4, 2016…..1-Junction Cells on GaAs & InP complete
-Week 16: Nov 18, 2016….gDRA Prototype 3-D model complete
-Week 24: Jan 13, 2017….gDRA Prototype (1-J) Single TRU complete
-Week 28: Feb 17, 2017…. 2-Junction Cells on GaAs or InP complete (requires contract)
-Week 40: May 7, 2017….gDRA Prototype (2-Junction Cells) complete (requires contract)

So looking at the notes, Jan 13, 2017 is a big day because that’s the day the first geodesic Dense Receiver Array will be completed (gDRA). The gDRA is the photovoltaic dome that wraps around the black body light source. Once that’s done, we could see a self-sustaining prototype generator produce power for the first time not too long after that. So perhaps a fully working prototype will be wheeled out for a public demo sometime near the end of January or in February.

Update 11/4/2016:

Brilliant Light Power (BrLP) released video of their October 26th Industry Day, which I just discussed above.

Video 1: Colin Bannon, Chief Technology Officer for British Telecommunications, discusses BT’s energy usage and their desire for a clean source of power. [BT is an absolutely massive telecom corporation, with a market cap of around 36 billion. They are about half the size of Time Warner to put them in perspective.]

Video 2: Kert Davies, Executive Director of ClimateInvestigations.org, discusses energy production and global warming (feel free to skip this one.)

Video 3: Dr. Randell Mills gives a complete overview of how the SunCell works and the latest test data.

Video 4: Dr. Peter Jansson of Bucknell University speaks on the independent validation of the SunCell system.

Video 5: John DeCarlo of Columbia Tech discusses how their applied engineering team is working with BrLP on the prototype of the reactor assembly, as well as helping plan for mass production.

Video 6: Brad Siskavich of Masimo Semiconductor discusses their work on the photovoltaic cells that will produce power from the SunCell reactor. This is a pretty interesting lecture that’s worth watching. He’s projecting they shouldn’t have too much trouble obtaining a 100 kWs from the SunCell in the future, while their initial prototypes will produce around 10 to 30 kWs.

Video 7: BrLP’s Dominic Jones discusses their long term market strategy.

Update 12/14/16:
Brilliant Light put out a new press release yesterday detailing the advisory board that will be working to bring their virtually-free energy generator to commercial launch next year.

December 13, 2016 04:30 AM Eastern Standard Time

CRANBURY, N.J.­­(BUSINESS WIRE)­­ – The Advisory Board consists of senior industry executives and includes Colin Bannon from BT, Bill Maurer from ABM Industries, Ray Gogel, former President of Current Group and US Grid Co., Matt Key, CEO of Everynet and three additional executives from Telecoms, Finance and Legal professions.

“We searched extensively to identify advisors that can help us answer some of the big questions to support our SunCell® commercial launch next year” said Dr. Randell L. Mills, Founder, President and CEO of Brilliant Light Power, Inc. “This is a team of senior executives from future customers, partners and advisory groups that will help us shape what we offer and how we offer it as we prepare to go to market”.

Bill Maurer, SVP from ABM Industries Energy division said “it’s a great opportunity to be part of the team that will launch the technology that will change the way we think about energy in the future”

Matt Key, CEO of Everynet said “Brilliant Light Power has put together a very sophisticated advisory group and they have given us some big questions to consider. The SunCell® technology is an incredible invention and we all look forward to helping the Company in achieving its full potential by transforming the worlds energy markets as we know them”

The Advisory Board will meet monthly and will be advising Brilliant Light Power on its the commercial offerings, launch markets, potential customers and organizational structure the Company will employ to deliver them.

Update 1/2/2017:

CNN Interview

Update 1/13/2017:

BrLP just released a new video today of the SunCell operating above 3000° C in a commercial design. The camera attenuation was up to a factor of 10,560 times to avoid saturation.

Even small increments above 3000° C drastically increase the final power output of the generator because the spectrum shifts more to the right, allowing the TPV cells to harness more of the energy.

Update 4/13/2017:

Latest press release from BrLP

BrLP has achieved automated control of the molten silver levels of the reservoirs of the dual molten metal injectors of its SunCell®. BrLP has also achieved automated control of the SunCell’s® thermal profile. These were the two gating items to a closed commercial SunCell® that can be deployed for field trials of thermal applications followed by electrical unit deployment with further photovoltaic converter development. The video of an excerpt of an electromagnetic pumping test shows the left reservoir overfilled at pumping initiation. The pumping rates automatically adjusted to establish and maintain matching relative levels and caused the molten streams to intersect at the center of the reaction cell chamber. BrLP is optimizing the designs and integrating this technology as it builds the first thermal field trial unit. The photovoltaic cells and cooling technology of the photovoltaic converter have been designed and are in the initial testing phase.
Now that they have automation that allows them to run the cell in a closed system, a prototype generator is very close indeed.

Update 5/31/2017:

New paper submitted for journal publication: Power Determination and Hydrino Product Characterization of Ultra-low Field Ignition of Hydrated Silver Shots. [PDF]

Update 9/20/2017:

Mills presented at the Society for Cable & Telecoms Engineers Energy 2020 conference in Denver, CO. on September 12, 2017. The audience consisted of leading Operating Executives from across the Cable industry. Dr. Mills’ presentation is available in PDF format here.
An updated production timeline was published in the presentation. Presently, BrLP plans to have units in field testing in the 2nd half of 2018, and a commercial launch in the 2nd half of 2019.

astro-physics, cosmology, GUT-CP, hydrino, Millsian, Molecular modelling, Randell Mills

Dr Randell Mills University lecture (Fresno State, Feb 2017)

“I had a dream last night! 😀 I was back in High School, the same physics classroom from when I was 14/15 years old, and my physics teacher was none other than Dr Randell Mills… IT WAS AWESOME! I was the only student in my class that understood GUT-CP, and I was his teachers pet… a bit like ‘Good Will Hunting’, but in High School.  Dr Mills was into Hip Hop music… … and then at the end of the class, after everyone else had left, I stayed behind for extra lessons… and Dr. Henry Kissinger was at the back of class room with a sly smile on his face like “keep up the studies Daniel”… it was bizarre!”
“Wow!… just… wow!”
“Anyhoo!” 😀

Dr. Mills Fresno State lecture, on February 27 2017.
Dr. Mills lays out the basics for ‘hydrino’ energy and GUT-CP, covering his theory of atomic structure (the electron-orbitsphere), cosmology, hydrino reactions in the Sun, the identity of dark matter, Millsian etc. The talk is probably one of his best yet, as it is given to students in an academic setting and not a business proposal.

 

GUT-CP, Millsian, Molecular modelling

DNA visualisation using Millsian… the future of molecular modelling?(Genetics, pharmaceuticals, neuroscience… psychedelics! :D)

“I’ll be honest from the start and say… ‘my interest in Millsian Inc. is purely recreational! 😀 Dimethyltryptamine, psilocybin, Lysergic acid diethylamide’…”
“Nice!”
“No, seriously though… those of you that are transhumanist! Wish to extend the human life into the hundred of years…”

Millsian Inc. is a revolutionary software developed by Randell Mills, which uses his classical GUT-CP theory to solve structures of not just simple atoms and molecules, but potentially ALL molecular structures (infinitely?) ranging from organic molecules to complex compounds (DNA to proteins etc.) . It uses classical Maxwell and Newton laws at an atomic level, and has been significantly more accurate in it’s predictions than ‘Quantum’ laws. Thus it can accurately build complex 3D structures and precisely calculate the total bond energy and the heat of formation.
Further information from the inventor can be found at Millsian.com and BrillaintLightPower.com.
Many believe this to be the future of molecular modelling, having profound implications in industries and areas of research such as pharmaceuticals, drug development, genetics, chemistry, material science… again… try and fathom what is being laid out here and realise the future possibilities are limitless!

hyd Insulin-fl-replace
Total Bond Energies of Exact Classical Solutions of Molecules Generated by Millsian 1.0 Compared to Those Computed Using Modern 3-21G and 6-13G* Basis Sets
R. L. Mills, B. Holverstott, B. Good, N. Hogle, A. Makwana

hyd classical to quantum

The case for Millsian physics (hydrogenicpower)

 

hyd physical compared

“Life, down to the last electron” (Brett Holverstott)
The phosphate strands, joined by a ladder of base pairs, spirals around one another in a double-helix. Seeing the structure visualized with Mills’s theory was not just a milestone for our software, a satisfying culmination of a year of development work, nut an extraordinary experience of beauty.
The strands seemed to be dancers, spinning, their energy and momentum thrusting them outward, a free arm flying through the air, the other locked with that of their partner.
Yes, I fell in love with the DNA molecule in that moment. Nature in all her indifference to human life, is beautiful in the abstract form of her physical architecture we find reflections of our own memory and experience.
Practically speaking, the ability to represent the exact the exact distribution of charge on the surface of the molecule is a huge leap forward from the approximations of quantum mechanics that are available in today’s molecular modelling software.
Mills’s theory should allow us to better predict chemical reactivity, and better predict how proteins fold. It should aid drug-discovery programs aiming to find molecules that fit reactive sites.  These are improvement that expect will allow great leaps in the pharmaceutical industry in years to come.” (Randell Mills and the Search for Hydrino Energy – Brett Holverstott)

dnabrett

My interest is in the future of genetic research and our understanding of DNA! (considering the little miracle we call DNA is still throwing us huge surprises and complete mysteries)
Baylor researchers unravel mystery of DNA conformation
“DNA is not a stiff or static. It is dynamic with high energy. It exists naturally in a slightly underwound state and its status changes in waves generated by normal cell functions such as DNA replication, transcription, repair and recombination. DNA is also accompanied by a cloud of counterions (charged particles that neutralize the genetic material’s very negative charge) and, of course, the protein macromolecules that affect DNA activity.”
BREAKING: Scientists Have Confirmed a New DNA Structure Inside Human Cells
It’s not just the double helix!
“As Zeraati explains, the answers could be really important – not just for the i-motif, but for A-DNA, Z-DNA, triplex DNA, and cruciform DNA too.
“These alternative DNA conformations might be important for proteins in the cell to recognise their cognate DNA sequence and exert their regulatory functions,” Zeraati explained to ScienceAlert.”
DNA Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications
“DNA can be used as the only component of a hydrogel, the backbone or a cross-linker that connects the main building blocks and forms hybrid hydrogels through chemical reactions or physical entanglement. Responsive constructs of DNA with superior mechanical properties can undergo a macroscopic change induced by various triggers, including changes in ionic strength, temperature, and pH. These hydrogels can be prepared by various types of DNA building blocks, such as branched double-stranded DNA, single-stranded DNA, X-shaped DNA or Y-shaped DNA through intermolecular i-motif structures, DNA hybridization, enzyme ligation, or enzyme polymerization.”

GUT-CP, hydrino

ARTICLE – “His Majesty The Electron” – by Koroeda (Philosophy Storm)

“The following article is authored by Koroeda at Philosophystorm.org . The article is translated from Russian, and I recommend you visit the site and check out previous articles from the author on the subject of GUT-CP and hydrino theory (I will post in following weeks). I’ve just translated and pasted into English, because the author has done a superb explanation of the history, the science and magnitude of this discovery. Also an introduction to Millsian.com, a molecular modelling software developed by Mills, which is proving to be far more accurate in solving atoms and molecules than any previous ‘Quantum’ modelling. I imagine such software and applications will lead to new developments in genetic biology, pharmaceuticals, neuroscience etc…
And hats off the Russians! ;D … Ushankas?”

(“Do I think the Russians will pay for this technology?… Do I bollocks! 😀 Well ‘head in the stars, feet on the ground’ so to speak… Russians, Chinese… Israel sure as f**k won’t pay for it! ;D … I’ll elaborate on my views concerning geo-politics in future posts!… … who gives a shit for the Brits?” :/)

His Majesty the Electron 

Systematization and communication
Science and Technology koroada
The turn of the 19th and early 20th centuries was really a great era, a turning point in the history of mankind. The moment of the “phase transition” of quantitative changes in qualitative, time of great discoveries that occurred one after another, radically changed the face of civilization. It was a true revolution in science and technology, when the human mind finally got enough tools to comprehend the greatest mystery-the riddle of the structure of matter.
April 30, 1897, there was a momentous event. On that day, the head of the Cavendish Laboratory, the English physicist JJ Thomson, spoke at a meeting of the Royal Society of London about his experiments with an improved cathode-ray tube, which led to the discovery of the first elementary electron particle. This day is considered the “birthday” of the electron, although Thomson’s discovery was only the final point in the many years of work of a number of scientists. The discovery of the electron had a tremendous impact on the development of science and technology. In fact, it has become a cornerstone for the whole building of modern civilization.
From this moment on, physicists began to advance different models of the structure of the atom, striving to bring it as close as possible to the experimental data obtained. It was quite a normal scientific process, where as the new data was received, the model also changed.
Thomson himself proposed his model in 1904, assuming that the atom is a positively charged sphere with electrons embedded in it, a kind of “plum pudding”. The Thomson model was experimentally disproved by Geiger and Mardsen in 1909, by experimenting with the scattering of alpha particles on a gold foil.
The next model of the atom was proposed by the discoverer of the proton, Ernest Rutherford. It was the so-called Planetary model, according to which negatively charged electrons move around a positively charged nucleus along circular orbits like planets in the solar system. It was a long-known and accepted in science model. So why not apply it to the atom? This is exactly what Rutherford did. However, this model had a cardinal drawback-the impossibility of explaining it to the stability of atoms. From classical electrodynamics it follows that if electrons move around the nucleus, experiencing centripetal acceleration as planets around the Sun, then they would, according to the laws of classical electrodynamics, emit electromagnetic waves, lose orbital energy of motion and, as a result, fall on the nucleus.
This problem had to be solved somehow, as a result of which, in 1913, an “improved model” of the atom-quantum model of Niels Bohr appeared. In contrast to the Rutherford model, in the quantum model, electrons move around the nucleus not in arbitrary orbits, but only in orbits with a strictly defined energy and are kept at a certain distance from the nucleus, because the centrifugal force leading an electron from the orbit coincides in magnitude with force of attraction between the electron and the nucleus. In turn, radiation or absorption occurs only at the moment of transition from one orbit to another, and only those orbits are stationary, in which motion the momentum of an electron is equal to an integer number of Planck’s constant. This model proved to be quite applicable to the simplest atom-hydrogen atom, but it did not work well in describing more complex atoms.
Nevertheless, it was taken as the basis that lies at the basis of the modern quantum-mechanical model of the atom. In the modern quantum-mechanical representation, the electron appears in the form of an “electron cloud” whose density of sections is proportional to the probability of finding an electron there. It is noteworthy that in the modern quantum-mechanical representation, an electron has no structure, being an unstructured particle.
This was a momentous moment in the history of science, a kind of “frontier strip” that separated the era of classical physics from quantum mechanical. For a long time, bitter arguments were being waged around quantum mechanics, and many outstanding minds, such as Albert Einstein, never accepted it. But over time quantum mechanics, and its generated ideas about the structure and properties of matter, have become dominant. Rather, the “Copenhagen school” of quantum mechanics, founded by Niels Bohr, dominated in science.
However, to what extent is the currently accepted model of electron in quantum mechanics close to reality? The very formulation of this question looks in the eyes of the orthodox physicists seditious. And meanwhile, the question of this by the present moment is more acute than ever. Why?
As you know, the main criterion for the truth of any theory is practice. So once, at one time, classical mechanics led to the implementation of a number of engineering innovations in real life, and in many ways was the reason for the beginning of the industrial revolution. The physical picture of the world that was true for its time served as the basis for a whole series of technological breakthroughs that laid the foundation of modern civilization.
According to this logic, quantum mechanics, which became the “Holy Grail” of modern physics, should lead to a huge number of them. However, in due measure this did not happen. Moreover, according to some physicists, stagnation has begun in physical science, which can be characterized as a period of “60 years without victories”.
What was the reason for this? Perhaps, not quite true physical picture of the world, a little connected with a reality? And how can it be that entire generations of scientists still do not notice this? And if they noticed, then why did not they take the courage to openly state this?
Probably, the answer to this question lies primarily in the social plane, in the very structure of science as a social phenomenon. The community of scientists is a community of people, and nothing human is alien to them. It has the same “social mechanisms” as in human society as a whole. For example, the oldest and most effective of them is authority. And as you know, an authoritative idea or teaching, gaining a lot of supporters (mastering the masses), becomes a “material force”. But at the same time, often, it becomes a doctrine (an important management tool), the encroachment on which is a fierce rebuff from its supporters. There is a remarkable irony in the fact that K. Marx himself, who first deduced this formula, became its victim.
Is it possible to encroach on the authority of the famous scientist, without corresponding consequences? Is it possible to try to refute the generally accepted system of views without “insulting the feelings” of its followers? The history of mankind gives a very unequivocal answer to this question. At best, the brave soul awaits the fate of Galileo, at worst the fate of Bruno. Although there were exceptions. But they only confirm the rule: the struggle of ideas is sometimes as brutal as the struggle of their bearers-people. However, time after time, sooner or later, Galileo still appears, and this is just as natural as the “fall” of an apple on Newton’s head. Human thought can not be stopped. So it happened this time.
Science continued to accumulate experimental data, and over time a large number of puzzles, requiring explanation, accumulated. And it is quite natural that scientists who tried to solve them tried to look differently at the model of the electron. However, for a long time these attempts were unsuccessful. Probably, this was a consequence of the fact that theoretical physicists continued to think in the former, quantum-mechanical paradigm, which was a strong binding factor for scientific thought. Having done a “turn wrong”, science was in a long dead end. The way out of it was impossible without a radical change in the paradigm of thinking, the development of a fundamentally new understanding of the mechanism of the behavior of an electron.
Finally, a way out of the current impasse was found by the famous American scientist, Dr. Randall Mills. It was for him, for the first time, that he was able to offer a much more successful, alternative model of the electron, which explains the mechanism of its behavior in a fundamentally different way, rather than the quantum-mechanical model.
A new concept of the electron was expounded by Dr. Mills in his fundamental theoretical work The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics.
What is an electron in the model of Dr. Mills?
Here is a visual picture of this model.

hyd6
Fig. from the site http://millsian.com/

In the understanding of Dr. Mills, an electron outside the atom, a free electron, is a two-dimensional, indivisible membrane (a flat thin film) consisting of negatively charged current loops that, when captured by a charge of the nucleus, can completely change its shape (spherical).
Thus, an electron in an atom is an “orbit-sphere” -spherical shell (like a soap bubble) surrounding the nucleus. However, this sphere is not monolithic, but consists of a continuous distribution of current loops that create two angular momentum vectors that generate the electron spin phenomenon. In general, the orbit is a very thin superconducting surface with a homogeneous mass and charge density.
In the atom, the orbitsphere functions as a “dynamically resonating cavity,” expanding and contracting as it absorbs and emits discrete frequencies of light (photons), which is the physical basis of quantization. After capture, the electric fields of the photons change the balance of forces that exists between the proton and the electron. The combination of the properties of the electron orbit and captured photon determines the radius of the electron shell. When the absorbed photons increase the radius of an electron before it is ionized, it becomes a free electron, which again returns to the shape of the disk in the absence of external fields that affect its curvature.
Here is a graphic picture of what electrons represent in an atom, using the example of the first 20 elements of the periodic table.

hyd periodic
Fig. from the site http://millsian.com

In molecules, electrons are stretched into two nuclei, forming an elongated spheroidal shell with nuclei in foci, the so-called “molecular orbital”.
So, the simplest molecule, the hydrogen molecule looks like this.

hyd simple
Fig. from the site http://millsian.com/

And this is what a molecule of water looks like

hyd water
Fig. from the site http://millsian.com/

Thus, according to the theory of Dr. Mills, atoms and bonds consist of discrete surfaces of negative charge, rather than clouds of probability density. This approach otherwise solves the problem of the stability of an atom rather than a quantum mechanical model, returning the understanding of an electron to the channel of classical physics (Maxwell’s electrodynamics). This, a completely new understanding of the nature of the electron, served as the basis for a whole series of discoveries.
However, initially, the new understanding of the nature of the electron put forward by Dr. Mills was very skeptical in the scientific community, since it fundamentally contradicted the widespread quantum mechanical concepts about it. He was attacked by a flurry of criticism from “authoritative scientists”.
In this case, the question arises: how true is the model of Dr. Mills?
Rather, it is legitimate to ask another question: how much closer is it to reality than the quantum mechanical model? And what remains “in the dry”, if you delete the “authoritative opinions” of many critics of Mills, whose main accusation is that he encroached on the established, well-known, and so all explaining, old, good quantum mechanics, devaluing the scientific authority of the set Its followers, both in the past and in the present?
Correctly. Already mentioned, the only criterion of the truth of theory-practice.
Everything is relative. So what are the practical results of applying the new model of the electron, and the theory based on it?
And what do we need models for? Naturally, in order to obtain explanations and generate predictions. And, the better the explanations, and the more effective the predictions, the better the model works. It was in this field that the new model of Dr. Mills proved to be the best.
One of the directions, where the new model of the atom showed its amazing effectiveness, was analytical chemistry, namely, computer simulation of molecular structures. The computer simulation program developed on the basis of the Mills theory (at the present moment-Millsian 2.1) proved to be much more efficient in calculations than its competitors based on the quantum-mechanical model.
Here is a comparative graph of the effectiveness of the two models.

hyd classical to quantum
Fig. from the site http://brilliantlightpower.com/ (Dr. Mills presentation)

As can be seen from the graph, the effectiveness of Dr. Mills’s model is many times higher, which allows us to calculate and present accurate profiles for molecules of any size and complexity, and with amazing accuracy to model such complex molecules as insulin and DNA.

hyd Insulin-fl-replace.gif
Fig. from the site http://millsian.com/

It is noteworthy that the images of molecules made under an electron microscope and the molecular models obtained by Mills coincide almost completely. Here, for example, a photograph of a molecule of pentacin superimposed on its own computer model.

hyd physical compared
Fig. from the site http://brilliantlightpower.com/ (Dr. Mills presentation)

Thus, the new model of the structure of the atom, put forward by Dr. Randall Mills, proved to be very effective in the field of modeling, showing excellent results in predictions.
However, GUT-CP theory of Dr. Mills became breakthrough not only in chemistry, but also in many other areas in science and technology. For example, in cosmology, where she solved many mysteries, such as the mystery of the solar corona, the mystery of dark matter, the mystery of the phenomenon of accelerating the expansion of the universe, and even the riddle of the phenomenon of gravity.
But the most remarkable, fateful for the history of mankind breakthrough Dr. Randall Mills committed in the field of energy, because his theory predicted the existence of a particularly compact state of hydrogen-hydrino (see Fig. Hydrinos in the periodic table above). Turning into hydrino, hydrogen releases a huge amount of energy, hundreds of times more than when burning hydrogen.
The discovery of hydrino served as the basis for the creation of a compact, cheap, incredibly powerful and environmentally friendly energy source that will in future allow humanity to solve such a fundamental problem as dependence on fossil fuels and the associated problem of harmful emissions into the atmosphere. The introduction of a new source of energy, as has already happened more than once in the history of mankind, in the future will lead to a new industrial revolution, radically changing the face of human civilization.
Solving the riddle of the electron, and putting forward a fundamentally new physical picture of the world, Dr. Randall Mills laid the foundation for another revolution in science and technology.
Is this enough to defeat skepticism?