Maybe the coronavirus is a punishment from God for not protecting your children against sexual abuse! (What? If I was a rabbi I could say that!)
Up to 450 paedophiles arrested a month in UK as internet drives ‘explosion’ of child sex abuse
Police ‘struggling to keep up’ with scale of online abuse and new methods used by paedophiles
Up to 450 paedophiles are being arrested every month in the UK amid an “explosion” of online offences, a report has revealed.
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) said law enforcement was “struggling to keep up” with evolving methods of child sexual abuse being facilitated by the internet.
A report released on Thursday said millions of indecent images of children were in circulation worldwide, and could be accessed from mainstream search engines in just three clicks.
It said that since 2016, British police have been arresting between 400 and 450 people a month for associated offences.
Chief Constable Simon Bailey, the national policing lead for child protection, told the inquiry that up to 600 children were being safeguarded each month as a result.
But he warned that because of increasing referrals from the National Crime Agency, police were being forced to prioritise suspects thought to present the greatest threat to children.
“We are doing our best to ensure that our efforts are targeted against those individuals who will pose a contact risk,” Mr Bailey said.
“We can’t arrest our way out of the problem, and we have to look at a far more holistic approach … we are at saturation point.”
- Police ‘overwhelmed’ by indecent cases call for new approach
- Children groomed on webcams ‘fuelling rise in child sex abuse images’
- Tech firms ‘must stop paedophiles uploading child sex abuse images’
He called for formal consideration of programmes aiming to prevent paedophiles from looking at the images as a potential alternative to prosecution in some cases.
“I know it’s an unpalatable consideration for a lot of people, politically it’s very difficult, but I think we are dealing with an unprecedented challenge,” Mr Bailey said.
“All I see is the numbers growing, the scale of the threat growing, the number of children being abused growing and, actually, we should be having a public debate that says: what else can we do to try and meet the threat?”
The inquiry heard that while the UK hosts only a small amount of the material itself, it is the “the third greatest consumer in the world of the live streaming of abuse”.
The disturbing practice sees paedophiles pay as little as £1 to watch a child being abused live, often from the Philippines.
IICSA accused internet companies of being too reactive, and driven more by a desire to avoid reputational damage than to prioritise child protection.
It joined calls for firms to increase efforts to proactively remove uploaded child sex abuse images, including using automated programmes, before they can be accessed.
Online age verification can be easily subverted, IICSA warned, highlighting paedophiles’ increased use of sexual photographs and videos that children take and share themselves.
Professor Alexis Jay, who chairs IICSA, said: “The serious threat of child sexual abuse facilitated by the internet is an urgent problem which cannot be overstated.
“Despite industry advances in technology to detect and combat online facilitated abuse, the risk of immeasurable harm to children and their families shows no sign of diminishing.”
She called for internet companies, law enforcement and government to implement “vital measures” to protect children against online abuse.
IICSA heard evidence over the internet’s impact on child sex abuse during hearings in January 2018 and May last year, where victims, charities, police, the government and industry representatives appeared.
It is one strand of a wider inquiry into how institutions have failed to protect children in England and Wales from sexual abuse.
The Internet Watch Foundation, which finds and removes online child sexual abuse images, said the “time has come for action”.
Chief executive Susie Hargreaves added: “There is no longer any reason not to be decisive on taking action against the predators who exploit and abuse children online. This report makes it abundantly clear there is no room for excuses.
“The internet industry and the government need to step up and tackle this head on.”
The NSPCC called the report a “damning indictment of Big Tech’s failure to take seriously their duty to protect young people”, referring to the child abuse being facilitated by their platforms.
A government spokesperson said: “Online child sexual exploitation and abuse is an appalling crime that the government is committed to stamping out.
“We are working at pace on new Online Harms legislation which will ensure tech companies prioritise the safety of children online and are held to account if they fail to do so.
“We will also soon be publishing the first of its kind national strategy to tackle all forms of child sexual abuse.”
Inquiry calls for web pre-screening to end UK child abuse ‘explosion’
IICSA report calls for social media firms to be made to act, as police struggle to keep up
Social media companies should be forced to pre-screen all uploaded material to help law enforcement agencies cope with the “explosion” in online child sexual abuse in the UK, a critical report says.
The UK is identified as the third-biggest consumer in the world of the livestreaming of abuse in the 114-page study by the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse (IICSA).
Published at the end of the inquiry’s hearings into internet-facilitated exploitation, the report says social media companies appear motivated to “avoid reputational damage” rather than prioritising protection of victims.
It calls for the industry to be legally required to pre-screen all uploaded material and adopt more stringent age-verification techniques for users.
End-to-end encryption of messages will make it far more difficult for the police to prevent and detect online abuse, the report warns, adding “regulation of the internet industry is now required”.
While enforcement efforts have reduced the global proportion of child sexual imagery on UK websites, the report notes, that has not hampered ease of access. Indecent photographs of children can still be reached “from common search engines in only three clicks”.
Chief constable Simon Bailey, the National Police Chiefs’ Council lead for child protection and abuse, has described the UK as “the third greatest consumer in the world of the live streaming of abuse”.
Since 2016, as many as 450 people a month are being arrested in the UK for abuse-related offences. “Despite technological advances to detect and prevent online child sexual abuse,” the study says, “law enforcement is struggling to keep up.”
As many as half a million men may have watched indecent images of children online, it is believed.
The IICSA is scathing in its criticism of social media companies, finding that “responses appeared reactive rather than proactive; action seemed driven by a desire to avoid reputational damage rather than to prioritise protection of children”.
It added: “We are unconvinced that internet companies fully understand the scale of the problem of livestreaming on their platforms such that they can properly assess whether they employ sufficient numbers of moderators to detect such offending.”
They need to ensure “there are sufficient numbers of human moderators with a specific focus on online child sexual abuse and exploitation”, the report states. “The value of human moderation is evident from the success achieved by the social network Yubo, whose moderators interrupt livestreams to tell underage users to put their clothes on.”
Online grooming appears to be increasing, with up to 10 grooming offences a day, according to research by the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC). “Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat are frequently named as the most common platforms where grooming takes place,” the report says.
The risks have become more widespread because the majority of UK children own a smartphone from around the time they start secondary school. “Although industry companies either prohibit or discourage children under 13 years old from accessing their platforms or services, the age verification process can be often easily subverted – simply by inputting a false date of birth,” the IICSA says.
“Children aged under 13 years old need additional protection. The industry must do more than rely on children to supply their true age when signing up to a platform. There must be better means of ensuring compliance with the current age restrictions.
“The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) frequently encounters images of livestreams which involve children from western backgrounds, the majority of whom are girls aged between seven and 13 years old.”
The sums paid to watch – and in some cases direct – the abuse are trivial. Sometimes it costs little more than a pound. The IWF has helped reduce illegal content on UK websites.
In one of its main recommendations, the report states: “The government should introduce legislation requiring providers of online services and social media platforms to implement more stringent age verification techniques on all relevant devices.”
From September this year, schools will have to include compulsory education in both primary and secondary schools that will help teach children about the need to stay safe online.
Prof Alexis Jay, the chair of the inquiry, said: “The serious threat of child sexual abuse facilitated by the internet is an urgent problem which cannot be overstated.
“Despite industry advances in technology to detect and combat online facilitated abuse, the risk of immeasurable harm to children and their families shows no sign of diminishing.
“Internet companies, law enforcement and government [should] implement vital measures to prioritise the protection of children and prevent abuse facilitated online.”
The report makes four recommendations for action the government should take to tackle online abuse:
- Requiring industry to pre‐screen material before it is uploaded to the internet to prevent access to known indecent images of children.
- Pressing the WeProtect global alliance to take more action internationally to ensure countries hosting indecent images of children implement legislation and procedures to prevent access.
- Introducing legislation requiring providers of online services and social media platforms to implement more stringent age verification techniques on devices.
- Publishing, without further delay, the interim code of practice in respect of child sexual abuse and exploitation as proposed by the online harms white paper(published April 2019).
The IWF, a UK-based charity responsible for finding and removing child sexual abuse material online, is a core participant in the inquiry.
Responding to the report, Susie Hargreaves, the IWF’s chief executive, said: “There is no longer any reason not to be decisive on taking action against the predators who exploit and abuse children online. This report makes it abundantly clear there is no room for excuses. The internet industry and the government need to step up and tackle this head on.”
Andy Burrows of the NSPCC, said: “This report is a damning indictment of big tech’s failure to take seriously their duty to protect young people from child abuse, which has been facilitated on their platforms on a massive scale.
“That’s why the UK must lead the way with world-leading regulation that forces industry to acknowledge the inconvenient truth that they are putting children at risk.”