“What… aside from Mills and GUTCP for the past thirty years…. I mean seriously… HOW THE FUCK DO PEOPLE NOT SEE THAT GUTCP IS THE SOLUTION?!?!”
Einstein’s Objections on Quantum Mechanics Gets Apparent Industrial Confirmation in Physics
DENTON, Texas, May 20, 2019 /PRNewswire/ — Albert Einstein did not accept the impossibility for quantum mechanics to identify the position of a particle with classical precision. For that reason, he made his famous quote “God does not play dice with the universe.” Einstein evidently accepted the validity of quantum mechanics for point particles in vacuum but believed that quantum mechanics is an “incomplete theory” in the sense that it could be broadened into such a form to recover classical determinism under appropriate new conditions.
Einstein communicated this view to B. Podolsky and N. Rosen at the Princeton Institute for Advanced Study, and all three together published in May 15, 1935, the historical paper known as the EPR argument (http://www.galileoprincipia.org/docs/epr-argument.pdf).
Five months later, the Danish scientist Neil Bohr published a strong rejection of the EPR argument. A number of mathematicians supported of Bohr’s rejection, including J. S. Bell, J. von Neumann and others. Thereafter, academia settled the issue with the rejection of the EPR argument in favor of the universal validity of quantum mechanics for whatever conditions exist in the universe.
The Italian American scientist Sir Ruggero Maria Santilli (http://www.i-b-r.org/Dr-R-M-Santilli-Bio-1-10-18.pdf), when at Harvard University under DOE support, discovered in the late 1970s that, while being exactly valid for the atomic structure and approximately valid for the nuclear structure, quantum mechanics is unable to represent the synthesis of the neutron from the hydrogen in the core of stars because of various technical reasons.
This insufficiency established the need for a ‘completion’ of quantum mechanics along Einstein’s vision. Jointly with various colleagues, Santilli initiated a long-term research aimed at the confirmation of EPR argument including the construction of a ‘completion’ of quantum mechanics into a broader theory known as hadronic mechanics for the representation of extended particles under mutual entanglement. Following decades of studies, Santilli published the 1998 paper confirming the EPR argument (http://www.galileoprincipia.org/santilli-confirmation-of-the-epr-argument.php).
Thereafter, Santilli initiated tests on the laboratory synthesis of the neutron from the hydrogen that led to the production and sale by the U. S. publicly traded company Thunder Energies Corporation (http://thunder-energies.com/) of an equipment producing on demand a flux of neutrons synthesized from a hydrogen gas (http://thunder-energies.com/docs/TEC-DNS-3Za.pdf).
The lack of completion of quantum mechanics appears to be Einstein’s most important prediction due to far reaching implications in all sciences. As an illustration, following the achievement of ‘Rutherford’s compression’ of the electron inside the proton needed for the neutron synthesis, Thunder Energies Corporation has achieved the ‘compression’ of electrons, this time, inside the neutron, resulting in a negatively charged proton called Santilli pseudoproton. Jointly, Thunder Energies Corporation is developing the synthesis of negatively charged nuclei, such as the pseudodeuteron, that are attracted by natural nuclei, thus eliminating the biggest obstacle for the achievement of the controlled fusion, which is given by the extremely large Coulomb repulsion between nuclei to due to their equal charge (http://www.santilli-foundation.org/purelco-interview-1-2-19.php).
Following the question on how the electron ‘compressed’ inside the neutron verifies the EPR argument, Santilli states: “The distance of the electron from the center of the neutron approaches Einstein’s vision of classical determinism since the smallest change of said distance causes the neutron decay into the proton and the electron. Similar conditions appear to occur for electrons inside the pseudoproton and the pseudodeuteron, and for other cases.”
Santilli is available to discuss the importance of these findings and the need to move forward with additional developments.
Einstein’s Objections to Quantum Mechanics Get Industrial Confirmation in Chemistry
DENTON, Texas, May 24, 2019 /PRNewswire/ — In the preceding release, dated May 20, 2019, we outlined studies by the Italian American scientist Sir Ruggero Maria Santilli (http://www.i-b-r.org/Dr-R-M-Santilli-Bio-1-10-18.pdf) and other scientists on the confirmation in physics of Einstein’s view that quantum mechanics is an ‘incomplete theory.’ The confirmation was based on the need to ‘complete’ quantum mechanics to achieve a representation of the neutron synthesis from the hydrogen in the core of stars since such a representation is not possible with quantum mechanics.
While accepting the historical value of the discoveries permitted by quantum chemistry, Santilli never accepted the notion of molecules based on the 20th century valence electron bonds because it is essentially a ‘nomenclature’ due to the lack of representation via equations. In fact, according to quantum mechanics and chemistry, valence electrons should repeal each other due to their equal charges and cannot possibly attract each other to form molecules.
According to Santilli, this insufficiency is evidence on the need for a ‘completion’ of quantum chemistry along Einstein’s argument. Jointly with his studies on the completion of quantum mechanics, while being at Harvard University under DOE support, Santilli initiated in the late 1970s long term research on the ‘completion’ of quantum chemistry into a form admitting an attractive force between identical valence electrons.
The biggest difficulty was the need of ‘completing’ 20th century mathematical methods for point particles in vacuum, into a form representing extended electron wavepackets in deep mutual penetration, also called entanglement. These efforts produced the ‘completion’ of 20th century mathematics into the novel isomathematics and the consequential ‘completion’ of quantum chemistry into isochemistry. The new methods did achieve in the late 1990s a strongly attractive force between identical valence electrons, (see the 2001 monograph http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-113.pdf).
The lack of completeness of quantum mechanics and, therefore chemistry, is Einstein’s most important prediction because of far reaching implications in all sciences. In this second and in the third release we shall indicate the importance of Einstein’s prediction for the solution of our alarming environmental problem. In fact, the achievement of an attractive force between valence electrons, and the ensuing more accurate representation of molecules, are permitting the development by the U. S. publicly traded company Thunder Energies Corporation of the novel HyperCombustion (patent pending) for the combustion of fossil fuels without appreciable carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons and other combustible contaminants in the exhaust. In Santilli’s view, these environmental advances could not be possible via quantum chemistry due to the the ‘nomenclature’ character of its valence bond, with ensuing lack of treatments via equations verifiable with experiments (http://www.thunder-energies.com).
When asked to indicate how his novel valence bond verifies Einstein’s vision of classical determinism, Santilli states: “When electrons are members of atomic clouds, their point-like approximation is correct, quantum mechanics is valid and classical determinism is impossible. By contrast, when entangled wavepackets of valence electron pairs bond themselves to form molecules, their extremely small mutual distance is fixed and can only be terminated via ionization processes. Hence, the strong valence bond between extended electrons appears to approach Einstein’s classical determinism. When in the core of stars, the same extended electron pair comes closer to classical determinism due to surrounding large pressures. Finally, when inside a black hole, the same extended electron pair reaches full classical determinism, in my view, for the evident reason that the local pressures and density are so big to prevent any motion.” For details, visit the PubRelCo interview http://www.galileoprincipia.org/santilli-confirmation-of-the-epr-argument-chemistry.php. Santilli is available to discuss additional developments toward the solution of our environmental problems.
Einstein’s Objections to Quantum Mechanics Get Industrial Confirmation in New Energies
DENTON, Texas, May 28, 2019 /PRNewswire/ — In the preceding releases, dated May 20 and May 24, 2019, we outlined studies by the Italian American scientist Sir Ruggero Maria Santilli (http://www.i-b-r.org/Dr-R-M-Santilli-Bio-1-10-18.pdf) and other scientists on the apparent confirmation in physics and chemistry of Einstein’s argument that quantum mechanics is an ‘incomplete theory.’ In this news release, we outline studies on the need for a ‘completion’ of quantum mechanics for consistent treatments of new clean energies and basically novel technologies.
Santilli states: “I never accepted quantum mechanics as a ‘complete’ theory because quantum mechanics has ‘no time arrow’ and, therefore, cannot consistently represent irreversible energy releasing processes. After learning during my graduate studies that quantum mechanics is characterized by time reversal invariant Lie algebras, I did my Ph. D. thesis in 1965 on their ‘completion’ into irreversible Lie-admissible algebras (http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-54.pdf) with related irreversible dynamical equations.”
Following various academic positions, in September 1978, Santilli joined the Department of Mathematics of Harvard University under DOE support to conduct innovative research in new clean energies. In that context, Santilli introduced the most general known realization of irreversible Lie-admissible algebras characterized by generalizing and differentiating the conventional product “ab” between number, functions, into the product of a and b to the right, a>b = arb, from the product of b and a to the left, a<b = asb, where r and s are arbitrary, positive, numbers, functions or matrices. The new multiplications, permitted the construction of new mathematics known as ‘hadronic mathematics to the right and to the left’,’ with corresponding ‘completion’ of quantum mechanics and chemistry into irreversible coverings known as hadronic mechanics and chemistry, where energy releasing processes forward in time are represented with ordered products to the right, while processes backward in time are represented with ordered products to the left. Different values of r and s assure irreversibility. Scientific and industrial applications to new clean energies were initiated only thereafter. The reversible isomathematics, isomechanics and isochemistry used in the preceding two releases are recovered for r = s= T > 0. Quantum mechanics and chemistry are recovered identically for r = s = 1 (http://www.santilli-foundation.org/elements-hadronic-mechanics.htm).
Santilli states: “I believe that our inability to achieve controlled nuclear fusions despite the investment of billions of public funds is due to inconsistencies in their treatment with time reversal invariant 20th century sciences. By contrast, at the U. S. publicly traded company Thunder Energies Corporation (http://thunder-energies.com/), we are attempting nuclear fusions that, when represented with the new irreversible sciences, appear to have no harmful radiation or waste (http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/hypercombustion-2019.pdf).”
When asked how irreversible processes may verify Einstein’s argument, Santilli states: “It appears that Einstein’s objections to quantum mechanics are verified in the scattering region of ongoing high energy particle collisions. Quantum mechanics is valid during the acceleration of protons in hadron colliders. However, quantum mechanics cannot be valid at the impact of protons against a target due to the irreversibility of the scattering. Einstein’s argument appears to be verified in the interior of high energy scattering regions due to their extreme densities approaching that of black holes under which quantum uncertainties and other laws are clearly inapplicable. The importance of Einstein’s argument, as well as its lack of general acceptance by the academic community for about one century, are illustrated by the need for a revision of ‘experimental results’ in high energy scattering experiments due to currently missing irreversible contributions.”
Contact: Paul Knopick
E & E Communications
SOURCE Santilli Foundation