Curing cancer! And HIV, AIDS… and host of other diseases & viruses (The Great Mu-Ta-To!… Millsian Inc, Luminides)

“To be honest, I think most people now actaully enjoy watching people die of cancer! WELL THEY MUST DO! Why else would they ignore the already known cures for many cancers that the U.S has patented?
Take the Brits for example! 😀 I think they actually want at least one of their children to die of cancer, because they’ve seen it in their favourite soap, and think…
“Well I’ve never experienced that… let’s feed my child absolute shit and see what happens. If they develop cancer, I’ll ignore the cures!”

GO WATCH LORENZOS OIL YOU FUCKING LOSERS! (or read the book, if you are able to actually read)

Besides most humans are fucking cancer! (‘Be not a cancer upon the Earth’)

Anyhoo… regarding the Israeli story. This has been blown way out of proportion! (figures)… First, the guy has said he believes his idea for curing cancer (ALL cancers) could be developed within a year, IF he has the funding behind him. He understands that even then, he’s looking at another few years to get the drug on to market.
Second, some people are saying “Well, if he has found a cure, ‘Big Pharma’ will take him out” and “He better find protection”... HE’S ISRAELI! Residing in Israel… fuck off! 😀
(say no more on that one)

Accelerated Evolution Biotechnologies Ltd.

When it comes to cancer, AIDS, pharmaceuticals, drug delivery (psychedelics! :D), genetics and DNA, we’re looking into Millsian, Inc and the future of molecular modelling 😉 We’re also looking into Mills’ previous work into Luminides (potential cure for cancer, HIV, AIDS etc. also)

Millsian, Inc., is the future of molecular modeling. Utilizing a new classical approach to solving atoms and molecules, our software will help researchers design the next generation of pharmaceuticals.


Company Overview
Millsian, Inc. is dedicated to developing the molecular modeling applications of The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics (GUT-CP), solving atomic and molecular structures by applying the classical laws of physics (Newton’s and Maxwell’s Laws) to the atomic scale.
The functional groups of all major classes of chemical bonding, including those involved in most organic molecules, have been solved exactly in closed-form solutions. By using these functional groups as building blocks, or independent units, a potentially infinite number of molecules can be solved. As a result, Millsian software can visualize the exact three-dimensional structure and calculate physical characteristics of almost any molecule of any length and complexity. While previous software based on traditional quantum methods resorted to approximations and required super computers for even simple systems, Millsian software requires no special expertise to solve complex proteins and DNA on a personal computer.
The Millsian competitive advantage includes rendering true molecular structures providing precise bonding characteristics, spatial and temporal charge distributions, and energies of every electron in every bond and bonding atom, facilitating the identification of biologically active sites in drugs; and facilitating drug design. The Company believes that this represents a major breakthrough in material science that has the potential to impact nearly all businesses involved in drug development and chemistry.



2004 – Luminide class drug delivery molecules – Brilliant Light Power

Synthesis and Evaluation of Novel Prodrugs of Foscarnet and Dideoxycytidine with a Universal Carrier Compound Comprising a Chemiluminescent and a Photochromic Conjugate
Luminide Pharmaceutical Corporation, 493 Old Trenton Road, Cranbury, New Jersey 08512
Received 7 August 2003; revised 21 November 2003; accepted 8 December 2003
ABSTRACT: To facilitate intracellular delivery of hydrophilic drugs, a generallipophilic carrier molecule was designed and synthesized. The carrier comprised a chemiluminescent-photochromic conjugate that potentiates diffusion across cell membranes to enhance intracellular uptake of the drug. The designed mechanism involves activation of the chemiluminescentmoiety by intracellular oxygen free radicals and inter molecular energy transfer of the excited state energy to the photochromicmoiety to result in release of the drug to allow the desired pharmacological effect to occur. Prodrugs off oscarnet and dideoxycytidine with several carriers caused suppression of a human immunodeficiency virus infection in human cultured macrophages that was up to five times more effective thanthe drug alone. Successful in vivo efficacytesting of prodrug has beenaccomplished by demonstrating the suppression of a retroviral infection of Friend leukemia virus in mice. Acute toxicity studies of the carrier indicated that it was nontoxic. 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 93:1320–1336, 2004 Keywords: prodrug; anti-HIV; foscarnet; dideoxycytidine; oxygen free radicals; chemiluminescence; intermolecular energy transfer; photochromism

1988 -Luminide and macroluminide class of pharmaceuticals
It has developed a broad class of pharmaceutical agents react directly with electron carriers or reactive species produced by transport of electrons to release a pharmacologically active molecule, to effect a therapeutic functional change in the body by an action brought by a receiver or no receiver.

A61K41/0042 Photocleavage of drugs in vivo, e.g. cleavage of photolabile linkers in vivo by UV radiation for releasing the pharmacologically-active agent from the administered agent; photothrombosis or photoocclusion

2004 – Preparation of prodrugs for selective drug delivery
Apr 21, 2004
Synthesis of a chemical compound having the formula A-B-C that may serve for applications such as drug delivery where A is a chemiluminescent, moiety, B is a photochromic moiety, and C is a biologically active moiety where A-B-C may serve as a prodrug. Novel synthetic methods of the present invention to form the prodrug comprised the steps of (1) forming a benzophenone, (2) forming a diaryl ethylene, (3) attaching a phthalimide moiety to at least one of the aryl groups of the ethylene to form a phthalimide-ethylene conjugate, (4) condensing two ethylene-phthalimide conjugates to form a phthalimide-pentadiene conjugate, (5) converting the phthalimide to the phthalhydrazide by reaction with hydrazine to form a carrier compound according to the present invention, and (6) reacting the carrier compound with an nucleophilic moiety of the drug to form the corresponding prodrug. Alternatively the carrier can be prepared by using the halo-substituted diaryl ethylene to make the corresponding cationic leuco dye-like compound with known methods. The cationic compound then is protected by reacting with a nucleophile and coupled with the aminophathalimide by palladium-catalyzed amination to form the protected phthalimide-pentadiene conjugate. The latter is refluxed with hydrazine to convert its phthalimide to the phthalhydrazide and acidified to give the carrier. An additional aspect of the present invention relates to the use of these compounds as antiviral agents for the treatment of viral infections such as HIV and as anticancer agents for the treatment of cancers such as bowel, lung, and breast cancer.



Still Want To Boycott Israel? Israeli Scientists Find Cure For Cancer, Report Says :D

“Find me a doctor. Not just any doctor, but a good Jewish doctor!… who can cure cancer” 😀

Bold claim (yeah we’ll cure that as well!)

Israeli Scientists: We’ll Have a Cure for Cancer Within a Year

Cure All
An Israeli pharmaceutical company is claiming it will have a “complete cure for cancer” within the next year.
The company is Accelerated Evolution Biotechnologies (AEBi), and based on the claims of its board chairman Dan Aridor, the treatment it’s working on sounds nothing short of revolutionary.
“Our cancer cure will be effective from day one, will last a duration of a few weeks, and will have no or minimal side-effects at a much lower cost than most other treatments on the market,” Aridor told The Jerusalem Post. “Our solution will be both generic and personal.”
Multiple Levels
According to The Jerusalem Post, AEBi’s cancer cure is called MuTaTo, which stands for “multi-target toxin.” It attacks cancer cells with several peptides — compounds comprising chains of amino acids — at once, and this multi-pronged attack is key to the treatment’s efficacy, the company says.

“We made sure that the treatment will not be affected by mutations; cancer cells can mutate in such a way that targeted receptors are dropped by the cancer,” AEBi CEO Ilan Morad told the Post. “The probability of having multiple mutations that would modify all targeted receptors simultaneously decreases dramatically with the number of targets used.”
“Instead of attacking receptors one at a time, we attack receptors three at a time,” he continued. “Not even cancer can mutate three receptors at the same time.”
State of the Cure
Morad claims in the Post that AEBi has used its cancer treatment to inhibit human cancer cell growth in mice without affecting the animals’ healthy cells at all. The company has also completed several in-vitro trials and will soon begin clinical trials, according to Morad. Those could wrap up within a few years, said AEBi’s CEO, after which the treatment could be available in specific cases.
That’s a lot of claims, but the Post article doesn’t mention the existence of any peer-reviewed research that could back them up.

Clearly, the kind of treatment AEBi is proposing would be extraordinary — after all, cancer is the second most common cause of death across the globe. But we’ll reserve our excitement until after this pharmaceutical company’s cancer cure stands up to the scrutiny of the scientific community.




Accelerated Evolution Biotechnologies Claims to Have a Breakthrough Cancer Cure

Brian Wang | January 28, 2019

Aridor, chairman of the board of AEBi and CEO Dr. Ilan Morad, say the AEBi anti-cancer treatment, which they call MuTaTo (multi-target toxin) is essentially on the scale of a cancer antibiotic – a disruption technology of the highest order. They are using peptides.
MuTaTo is using a combination of several cancer-targeting peptides for each cancer cell at the same time, combined with a strong peptide toxin that would kill cancer cells specifically. By using at least three targeting peptides on the same structure with a strong toxin, AEBi made sure that the treatment will not be affected by mutations. Cancer cells can mutate in such a way that targeted receptors are dropped by the cancer.
Some cancer tumors erect shields which create access problems to large molecules, such as antibodies. MuTaTo acts like an octopus or a piece of spaghetti and can sneak into places where other large molecules cannot reach. Morad said the peptide parts of MuTaTo are very small (12 amino acids long) and lack a rigid structure.
AEBi finished its first exploratory mice experiment, which inhibited human cancer cell growth and had no effect at all on healthy mice cells, in addition to several in-vitro trials. AEBi will soon begin a round of clinical trials which could be completed within a few years and would make the treatment available in specific cases.
Solution Benefit Summary

* The solution will hit and activate or deactivate any protein-based target.
* They dramatically expand the range of targets, to include even the most challenging ones.
* They are able to optimize. They have an unparalleled high “signal to noise” ratio.
AEBi Platform features:
* No limit on the number of rounds in the screening process.
* Each round has both affinity and efficacy properties.
* Hitting the hardest targets.
AEBi (Accelerated Evolution Biotechnologies) is a development-stage biopharmaceutical company engaged in discovery and development of therapeutic peptides. They developed a combinatorial biology screening platform technology which they call the SoAP platform. It provides functional leads to very difficult targets.
The potentially game-changing anti-cancer drug is based on SoAP technology, which belongs to the phage display group of technologies. They introduce DNA coding for a protein, such as an antibody, into a bacteriophage – a virus that infects bacteria. The protein is then displayed on the surface of the phage. Researchers can use these protein-displaying phages to screen for interactions with other proteins, DNA sequences and small molecules.
In 2018, a team of scientists won the Nobel Prize for their work on phage display in the directed evolution of new proteins – in particular, for the production of antibody therapeutics.
AEBi is doing something similar but with peptides, compounds of two or more amino acids linked in a chain. According to Morad, peptides have several advantages over antibodies, including that they are smaller, cheaper, and easier to produce and regulate.
Written by Brian Wang, Nextbigfuture.com

The Great MuTaTo!


It’s an X Files Episode! 😀



“Soooo he may have touched some children, but c’mon now! IT’S MICHAEL JACKSON!”

“I never knew Independence Day was a documentary film. Learn something new everyday day! May have to watch it again… my view is… I think we’re forgetting something very important an all this… okay sure he touched some children, but the man was a great singer and he entertained us for so many years. All this bad mouthing, putting the man down when he is no longer here to defend himself… maybe he did touch some children now and again, but c’mon now it’s Michael Jackson… MICHAEL JACKSON!”

It’s not as though the documentary film asked someone who truly knew him… someone who has never been known to lie, whose word can be completely trusted, and who has never been known to deceive the public in any way!

We can ask Michael now! Even after his death!

Michael Jackson ‘was running most sophisticated child sex operation the world has known’ – and was ‘abusing kids until the day he died’


What You Should Know About the New Michael Jackson Documentary

Here… my mum went to buy Snoop Dogg DoggyStyle in 1993 from Woolworths… when she asked if the store had it in stcok, the woman at the counter said
“Oh no, he’s a suspected gang member, our store doesn’t sell music from artists such as that”
.. my mothers reply? 🙂
“Do you have Michael Jackson?”
“Well yes of course”
“Well he’s a suspected paedophile so was does that say about your company?”


UK nursery worker named youngest female ‘paedophile’… Women as child sex child offenders (often nursery workers)… 64,000?

I’m just absolutely fascinated by the whole phenomena of child sex abuse. The only reason I came to investigate such crimes was because of MI5 and their cover-ups of historic child sex abuse (if it wasn’t for that, I would never have taken an interest)

I’m fascinated by the difference between a paedophile and a child abuser (‘not every paedophile is a child abuser, and not every child abuser is a paedophile’).
I’m fascinated as to why adults choose to engage in this behaviour (in many different forms)… I’m fascinated by the recent increase of this crime in the UK (described by some now as an ‘epidemic’)… more than anything, I’m fascinated by the British publics response to it! 

I am now being gang-stalked by what I can only describe as a group of (sometimes known and convicted) paedophiles, child abusers… and the police are fully aware of it! Shit load of people know! 

I’m just fascinated how the United Kingdom is continuing to bury it’s head in the sand regarding this… forget Brexit, and politics, and whatever else… if the UK can’t ensure large portions of it’s adult population are not engaging in predatory sexual behaviour with children… it is quite simply a failed society! 😀 (no two fucking ways about it). Society needs a completely different approach to combating this… and the UK will not dare admit it has a problem (Why?)

What’s being brought up now is the rise in women who are paedophiles/child sex abusers… Britain’s ‘worse’ convicted female paedophile was a nursery worker… Britain’s youngest convicted paedophile was a nursery worker… there’s been other cases of female nursery workers… quite obviously female paedophiles may be using the profession to get access to young children. (YOUNG CHILDREN)

What sort of studies have been done on female paedophilia/child sex abusers?
What are the main difference between male and female offenders?
What are the statistics?
Is it on the rise?

Teenage nursery worker who sexually abused children as young as two jailed

Abuser was 17 when she committed offences against victims aged two and three

Elms had undergone safeguarding training as part of her college course, and used “sustained and extensive” planning to gain access to children, the judge said.

Nursery worker Vanessa George: women and child sex abuse

Child sex abuse by women may be more widespread than people realise, according to experts, following the case of nursery worker Vanessa George, from Plymouth, Devon.

Because of the position of trust they hold, it is thought that many cases go unreported.
And the psychological damage it does to their victims can be even more severe.
The Child Exploitation and Online Protection (CEOP) centre, which assisted detectives investigating the abuse by Vanessa George, Angela Allen and Colin Blanchard, has commissioned studies into the behaviour of female sex predators.

Staff at CEOP said female sex offending is perceived as rarer and therefore more shocking than male sex offending.
A spokeswoman said: “It’s very difficult for us as a society to accept that women can be capable of those crimes and be sexually motivated to commit them.

“The way we think of women as carers of children, it’s hard to conceive they could be capable of treating children that way.”
The spokeswoman said the number of female offenders was difficult to quantify, but “more and more” were being identified due to raised awareness of sexual offending and the training offered by agencies, including CEOP.
“This does mean the number of female offenders is therefore likely to increase,” she said.
“It’s accepted that sexual abuse is under-reported. Children rarely come forward and disclose sexual abuse – even if it’s uncovered. Children rarely discuss their experiences.
“But with female perpetrators that under-reporting is even greater.
“Women are afforded a greater position of trust and children are asking themselves ‘am I going to be believed if I come forward?’ or ‘is this going to make it worse for me?’.”
The spokeswoman said some studies have suggested the percentage of female sex offenders could be as high as 20%.
But differences between male and female offenders have been identified, she said.
“Women use the internet differently. We don’t see a high volume of image collection on women’s computers, as we do on male offenders’.
“Women use the internet to network and talk on forums online about their offending.”
The impact a female offender has on a child can be even greater than the devastating influence of a male offender, the spokeswoman said.
She said: “The impact abuse has on the way children form attachments to others can be so destructive.
“It’s hugely destructive anyway, but it has a particular impact when that perpetrator is a woman.”

Up to 64,000 women in UK ‘are child-sex offenders’

After Plymouth case shocked the nation, police say number of women abusing children is rising

Child sex abuse by women is significantly more widespread than previously realised, with experts estimating that there could be up to 64,000 female offenders in Britain.
Researchers from the Lucy Faithfull Foundation (LFF), a child protection charity that deals with British female sex offenders, said its studies confirmed that a “fair proportion” of child abusers were women. Donald Findlater, director of research and development, said results indicated that up to 20% of a conservative estimate of 320,000 suspected UK paedophiles were women.
The release of the figures comes days after a Plymouth nursery school worker, Vanessa George – together with Angela Allen from Nottingham and Colin Blanchard from Rochdale – pleaded guilty to sexually abusing young children.

Last night George’s husband appealed to her to identify her victims, whom she has so far refused to name. Andrew George, 41, said: “I would plead to her, tell those parents, all those parents who want to know.

“If Vanessa has got any shred of human decency in her she should tell those parents.” At her trial, Mr Justice John Royce had urged her to tell police the names of her victims.
Findlater said: “There was some suggestion it was only blokes that sexually abused children. Over time those arguments have fallen aside and people have had to wake up to the fact that actually, sadly, there is a fair proportion of women abusing as well.”
There are 32,000 names on the sex offenders register. But LFF researchers suggest that the real number of paedophiles is 10 times this figure. Provisional studies suggest that between 5% and 20% are women.
The calculations put the number of female child-sex offenders in the UK at between 48,000 and 64,000, a figure Findlater describes as “highly possible”. He said: “The problem is far bigger than conviction rates and, if you look at survivor studies, you end up with a very different story about the scale of the problem of female sexual abuse.”

Detectives at Scotland Yard’s paedophile unit, meanwhile, disclosed that they had detected an “increased prevalence” of female offenders. Metropolitan police sources said that quantifying the number of paedophiles in the UK was problematic, but there were likely to be hundreds of thousands.
Steve Lowe, director of Phoenix Forensic Consultants, which treats and assesses child sex abusers, said the true number of female paedophiles has remained hidden for too long.
“As a society, we find women sex offenders difficult to acknowledge. But those of us who work with paedophiles have seen evidence that women are capable of terrible crimes against children – just as bad as men.” He said some female abusers remained hidden because they appeared before the family courts, where their cases were not publicised because of reporting restrictions.
The latest government figures, published six months ago, showed that 56 female child sex abusers were in custody, with 49 sentenced and seven on remand. Another 84 were under supervision in the community. Fewer than 2% of people on the sex offenders register are women.
Officials at the government’s Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP) said under-reporting of incidents involving female abusers was a concern and warned that “copycat” abusers may attempt to replicate the abuse that took place at Plymouth’s Little Ted’s nursery, where George worked.
George, Allen and Blanchard, all 39, met through the networking site Facebook. Officials at the CEOP and at Scotland Yard believe that the internet is driving an increase in the number of sex abusers of children. However, while offences are on the rise, police say that they have detected no changes in the patterns of abuse that are carried out by paedophiles, whether men or women.

Female paedophiles: Why women sexually abuse children

As a woman is jailed for her part in running a ‘depraved’ child sex abuse ring, Radhika Sanghani speaks to experts about what motivates female abusers

Marie Black, 34, has been sexually abusing children for the last 10 years.
She was at the centre of an “utterly depraved” sex abuse ring where two boys and three girls – all aged under 13 – were raped and abused.
Black organised sex parties where children were ‘raffled’ to people who would then rape and abuse them.
A judge, who jailed her for life, said it was ‘the most harrowing case’ he’d ever seen.
“The children were subjected to sexual abuse of the worst kind,” he said. “They were simply passed around like toys.”

Black was jailed along with two men who were also part of the sex abuse ring: Michael Rogers, 46, and Jason Adams, 44, as well as Carol Stadler, 59, who was found guilty of assault causing actual bodily harm.
But while the men were respectively found guilty of 14 and 13 counts, including rape, (Stadler was clearled of nine other charges bar the assault), Black was found guilty of 23 offences.
It’s why she is now being labelled as the ‘mistress’ of the gang.
This has shocked many. Sadly paedophilia and sex abuse rings are rarely out of the headlines, but a female ringleader who has sexually abused children is more unusual.

We find female sex offenders abhorrent
Forensic psychologist Nina Burrowes says the gender of female abusers often accounts for some of our shock: “I do generally believe [women sexually abusing children] happens less often than men, but it happens a lot more often than you realise. I suspect it’s much more underreported.”
She suggests that society has not been willing to learn more about female paedophilia (where adults are sexually attracted to children) and female child sex abuse (where they either act on those impulses and sexually abuse children, or do it for different reasons).
“We find it abhorrent because it challenges our ideas of women and motherhood,” she explains. “We also find it frightening because we like to live with the idea that men are dangerous and women are safe, so when you see children to a male stranger in the park it’s dangerous but if they’re talking to a woman it isn’t.
“Most women are motivated by an intimacy need. They want to feel close to someone.”
Franca Cortini

“Female sex offenders challenge those notions, which is why a lot of people struggle to believe these things.”
Yet women are paedophiles and child sex abusers. Franca Cortoni, professor of criminology at the University of Montreal, has written extensively on female sex offenders and tells me that though there is an overlap in the way male and female child abusers think, there can be specific motivations for women to offend.
“We do know there are women who are motivated by sexual interest in children but they are only a tiny proportion of female sex offenders,” she explains. “Most women are motivated by an intimacy need. They want to feel close to someone.”
Some of those women will choose an adolescent victim – such as recent cases of teachers having sex with teenage boys and grooming them. “These women are more into the idea of a relationship,” explains Cortoni. “They just choose an adolescent instead of an adult partner because they’re less threatening, and they can be in charge.”

Women offending with male partners
But when it comes to women who chooses a prepubescent child as their victim, she says: “I think they have a different type of need. It’s no longer that relationship need. They want to feel close to someone who can’t reciprocate in that context. They want to feel totally in charge.”
Another key difference between male and female sex offenders is that a third of women do it alongside someone else – typically a male partner.
This is a common feature in the most high-profile cases of female offenders, such as Rosemary West, who helped her husband Fred to rape, torture and murder children and women, and Myra Hindley, who murdered and sexually assaulted five children alongside Ian Brady.

It’s also a crucial part in the Black case, where her two former partners were part of the sex abuse ring.
Cortoni says: “There’s definitely a very tiny indication that for some of these women, it’s because they’ve been coerced. That doesn’t mean physical violence. It could be very much emotional or psychological. They’re akin to women who are victims of domestic violence.”
This was part of Black’s defence from her lawyers, who said she had suffered domestic violence at the hands of Adams and that he “was a very manipulative” man who exploited her. But barristers representing Adams and Rogers rejected this notion saying: “She is the common denominator between all the offences.”

Male coercion of female abusers
But there have been cases where this coercion is clearer. Paedophile and former Lostprophets singer Ian Watkins was jailed in 2013 for child sex offences including the attempted rape of a baby. But as well as committing the crimes himself, he also encouraged a female fan to abuse her child during a webcam chat, as well as enticing another to join him on his paedophilic mission.
The judge sentencing him at the time, Mr Justice Royce, said: “You had many fawning fans. That gave you power. You knew you could use that power to induce young female fans to help satisfy your insatiable lust and take part in the sexual abuse of their own children.”

Cortoni explains more about these kinds of female sex offenders: “They’ll do whatever he says in that context because they lose who they are. Some believe it will bring them closer to their partner. Often it’s to do with their own background and whatever happened when they were raised.
“People think they’re mentally ill but they’re not always. I prefer to say they’re predominantly dysfunctional.”

Serial sex offenders
While some of the most high-profile cases of female sex offenders show them committing repeated crimes against children, such as Black and West, it isn’t a typical pattern. Instead Cortoni explains that serial female child abusers are rare:
“The make-up of women is different to men. I think in terms of sexuality and preferences, women as a group tend to require more affiliation and closeness with their sexual partner. When serial sexual offending occurs, it’s normally from deviant sexual arousal.
“Female child sex abuse is something we really need to open our eyes and ears to.”
Nina Burrowes

“They [typically men] are either strongly attracted to children and want more variety or they’re aroused by violence, like serial rapists. Women’s sexual patterns don’t work quite the same way.”
The only worry is that this could change. Tony Beech, criminological psychology professor at the University of Birmingham says that women don’t commit as many crimes as men but they might, very gradually, start catching up.
“Women seem to be more like men these days,” he explains, referencing a recent rise in drinking and violence. That wouldn’t necessarily affect their chances of becoming paedophiles, which is based on sexual attraction to children, but it could mean an increase in women being sexually violent towards children.
It’s why, as Burrowes says, society needs to start recognising and believing that women can be child sex abusers too: “It’s something we really need to open our eyes and ears to.”


All I’m saying is, had the Nazis invaded Briton… Brits would have sold the Jews out no doubt

“From a historical perspective, yes the Brits would have sold their Jewish neighbours out like every other European nation (there where partisans and resistance fighters I know)

… but if it wasn’t for 22 miles of water and the mighty United States of America
(who every good historian knows where in two minds as to whether to side with the Nazis)… not only would every Brit be speaking German… there’d be no Israel and I doubt very much a Jewish people.
(like I said, the United States where in two minds as to whether to join the war on the side of the Allies or The Nazis… … probably tossed a coin knowing the Americans)

People say ‘My Grandad  fought to save the Jews”… no he fought to keep Britain Nazi free… not for the Jews! (besides, no-one knew what has happening in those camps until after the Nazis where defeated… supposedly)


As Holocaust raged, UK officials blamed Jews for rising wartime anti-Semitism

A classified file recently released to a British newspaper lifts the lid on complacency and prejudice at the heart of Winston Churchill’s propaganda ministry

LONDON — British government officials were repeatedly warned of a rising tide of anti-Semitism on the home front during World War II, but took no action to counter it, newly released documents have revealed.
Instead, they said Jews themselves were to blame for any increase in prejudice, and belittled reports of it.

The highly sensitive papers have been stored in the National Archives for the past seven decades, and were not due to be made public until 2021. They were published this week by The Times following a request by the newspaper under Britain’s Freedom of Information Act.

The file, “Anti-Semitism in Great Britain,” contains internal documents from the wartime Ministry of Information, which was charged with monitoring public opinion, pumping out propaganda to maintain morale, and censoring news and information.

Its discovery, The Times reported, “will revive nagging doubts about whether, had the Nazis invaded, Britons would have betrayed or rescued their Jewish neighbours.”
In a May 1943 report to Brendan Bracken — a close confidant of Winston Churchill who served as Minister of Information for much of the war — the ministry’s top civil servant suggested that “there had been a considerable increase in anti-Semitic feeling” since the outbreak of the conflict nearly four years prior.

Brendan Bracken was warned about rising anti-Semitism. (Wikimedia commons/ Yousuf Karsh)
But, continued Cyril Radcliffe, the ministry’s director general, regional officials he had called to a meeting on the subject “regard it as quite beyond argument that the increase of anti-Semitic feeling was caused by serious errors of conduct on the part of Jews.”
Only Northern Ireland and the northeast of England appeared not to have seen an increase in anti-Semitism. The picture appeared similar in both rural parts of the country and the big industrial cities, as well as in areas, such as Manchester and Leeds, with long-established Jewish communities, and others where few Jews lived.
During the course of the war, as the East End of London was subject to heavy German bombing and mothers and children were evacuated, many Jews were sent to live in areas without large Jewish populations. It has been estimated that half of those evacuated from the East End — the epicenter of the capital’s Jewish community at the time — were Jews.
Radcliffe suggested that resentment against Jewish evacuees was a factor in stoking tensions. Jews, he advised Bracken, had displayed “a lack of pleasant standards of conduct as evacuees.” A further source of complaints reported to him by the ministry’s regional civil servants was the allegation that Jews had “an inordinate attention to the possibilities of the ‘black market.’”
Rationing had produced an illegal trade in goods such as food, clothing and petrol, which allowed those who could afford it to escape the worst of wartime shortages and restrictions.

“I reminded them,” Radcliffe said of his meeting with the officials, “that it was part of the tragedy of the Jewish position that their peculiar qualities that one could well admire in easier times of peace, such as their commercial initiative and drive, and their determination to preserve themselves as an independent community in the midst of the nations they lived in, were just the things that told against them in wartime when a nation dislikes the struggle for individual advantages and feels the need for homogeneity above everything else.”
Radcliffe recommended a low-key approach of action. “I thought that our main contribution from headquarters would be to try to keep before people’s minds the recollection that anti-Semitism was peculiarly the badge of the Nazi,” he wrote to Bracken.
He also appeared to fear that countering Jew-hate might simply publicize anti-Semitic myths.

Referring to a March 1943 stampede at a bomb shelter in the East End’s Bethnal Green that killed 173 people — and which had been falsely blamed on panicking Jews — Radcliffe wrote: “If specific stories hostile to the Jews could be traced and pinned down as untruths, such as the recent canard of the Jews being responsible for the London shelter disaster, this should be done by countering it with the individuals who were putting it about, not by giving it general publicity.”
Another document unearthed by The Times drips with contempt for British Jews’ fears about anti-Semitism.
After a high-profile black market case in Salford in Greater Manchester, a local Ministry of Information civil servant reported to London that there had been “anxiety among the Jews culminating in the visit of two representative Jews to the regional office.”
At the meeting, the community’s emissaries suggested employers were discriminating against Jews, highlighting the fact that local councils were — despite shortages — failing to employ Jewish nurses.

Their concerns went unheeded. “It appears that the Jewish leaders are so anxious to avoid admitting that ‘The People’ have been especially blameworthy in black markets that they are unwilling to take strong spiritual and communal action,” the memo suggested. “Blindness to facts and alternate periods of arrogance and whines are unlikely to endear the Jewish cause to Britain.”
A London civil servant noted approvingly the “reasoned arguments put forward in this memorandum.”
At other times, officials simply displayed complacency. Shortly after Radcliffe’s memo to Bracken, the minister invited Margaret Corbett Ashby, a Liberal party politician, feminist and suffragette, to a committee he had convened to advise him on the problem.
Corbett Ashby told Bracken and his officials of her alarm about increased anti-Semitism. The latter subsequently did their best to downplay her warnings.
One civil servant examined the weekly reports of the Special Branch, the police unit which works with Britain’s security services to combat extremism and subversion at home, for examples of anti-Semitism.
He listed six instances dating back over the previous six months. They included stickers plastered on doors and windows of businesses in the heavily Jewish area of Shoreditch in the East End which featured two Jews and the words: “Britannia rules the waves — yeth, but we rule Britannia”; a fascist publication; a far-right pamphlet which blamed Jews for anti-Semitism; and anti-Semitic graffiti such as “Down with the filthy Jews” and “burn the Jews” in parts of London, Manchester and Hove, a seaside town in southeast England with a large Jewish population.
“You will agree that there is nothing in all this to suggest anything in the nature of organised activity, at any rate on an important scale,” the official wrote. The colleague to whom his memo was passed wrote dismissively on it: “I did not think that Mrs. Corbett Ashby’s account showed signs of careful consideration.”
The file indicates politicians sometimes lent the community a more sympathetic ear than their civil servants.

Bracken’s predecessor, Duff Cooper, supported a Jewish homeland in Palestine and had resigned from prime minister Neville Chamberlain’s cabinet in protest of the 1938 Munich Agreement which appeased Hitler’s aggression towards Czechoslovakia. In early 1941, Anthony de Rothschild, who had founded the Central British Fund for German Jewry to assist the Nazis’ first victims, wrote to him laying out the UK community’s anxieties.
“There is an impression that there has been of recent weeks a growth of anti-Semitism in the country and there is some reason for supposing that it may not be unconnected with enemy propaganda, although this is hard, of course, to establish,” de Rothschild argued.
“Representatives of the Jewish community in London have considered the matter and are naturally perturbed from their own point of view, but it also seems to them that developments on this line help the enemy and damage the war effort,” he wrote.
He proposed a radio broadcast labeling anti-Semitism as a threat to Britain.
Cooper’s response was warm. “My dear Tony,” he began, “I shall be very pleased to have a talk with you about the important matter.” Four months later, however, Churchill moved him to another government post.
As The Times notes, “the depths of the horrors uncovered by the liberators” in 1945 meant that “anti-Semitism became taboo.” However, the paper added, “there was a price to pay for the British authorities’ tolerance of anti-Semitism” during the war. It cited the anti-Jewish rioting which occurred in 1947 in the UK after the Irgun hanged two British sergeants in mandate-era Palestine in retaliation for the execution of three of its members.
Although nobody was killed, the violence — which was worst in Liverpool and Manchester in northwest England and the Scottish city of Glasgow — shocked many. Even the newspapers which had sensationalized the British soldiers’ murder swiftly called for calm, branding the weekend’s disturbances “a national disgrace.”
Moreover, while events in Palestine had been the immediate cause, the link between wartime anti-Semitism and its thankfully brief violent post-war manifestation was a clear one. Britain was already struggling under the weight of the cost of the war and reconstruction, with austerity imposed by the government and rationing and controls still largely in place. In 1947, these difficulties were compounded by a sharp economic downturn and rising unemployment.
Jews, historian Tony Kushner has suggested, became a scapegoat, being seen as “black marketeers gaining from the war but not contributing to the effort.”

While the Ministry of Information had closed its doors the previous year, the anti-Semitic myths it failed to tackle during the war lingered on.