The British have essentially had a complete mental breakdown because of this! (they couldn’t handle the power of the Sun).
No offence Israel, but I’m coming to Tel Aviv… to Jerusalem, and I’m going to get Biblical on your arses! 😀
“For the first time in human history, the power of the Sun has been brought down to the surface of planet Earth”
“The most important discovery since fire”
I have NEVER been so serious of anything in my life… Israel, take all those Quantum Physics books and (don’t burn them) but put them to one side for a moment… take physics back one hundred years and start a fresh… read Randell Mills’ work… read The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics… study it in depth, from it’s inception, it’s history, it’s continual evolution… the background to hydrino energy… the implications it has in EVERY of discipline of science (and philosophy).
This discovery is the greatest in recent human history… anyone that grasps it, and understands it, masters it, can propel technology and science forward in ways we can not yet imagine.
EVERYTHING from energy, physics, cosmology, chemistry, genetics, molecular biology, drug development, ‘anti-gravity’, synthetic materials, electronics… there is NOTHING this is not going to effect… aviation, space exploration, mineral extraction, medicine…
I’ve exhausted myself… I don’t know what else to say. Israel… apply your best and brightest to this, whilst everyone else is pursuing ‘Quantum’… you will emerge as the technological powerhouse of the next hundred years… a technological superpower… unrivalled and untouchable. (sorry to those that disagree but there are military applications, I imagine Israel is already thinking the same!)
It’s the greatest gift you have since… … the Ark of the Covenant! 😀 (you can build yourself a new one! A 21st century Ark of the Covenant!)
Other inventions/patents from Dr Randell Mills ranging from genetic sequencing to selective drug delivery to Resonant magnetic susceptibility imagine (ReMSI)… the guys a genius!… https://www.google.com/search?q=randell+mills …
“When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed.”
£1302.00 … for a one day conference! No wonder these people rule the world!
Leadership in a climate of disruptive change
18 March 2019 – 9:30am 5:30pm
Chatham House, London
Energy Transitions 2019
New Actors, New Technologies, New Business Models
18 March 2019 – 9:30am to 5:30pm
Chatham House, London
A global shift in the energy sector is under way with the rise of renewable energy sources spearheaded by their dominance of investment in the power sector. This is leading to disruptive change as the greater deployment of renewables and many associated technologies, such as storage, are challenging existing business models and threatening the market dominance of the existing actors. At the same time investment in fossil fuels has stabilized, as a slowdown of the financing of coal has been balanced by modest increases in spending in upstream oil and gas.
New global trends, electrification of new sectors such as transport and heating, along with the provision of modern energy services to over a billion people lacking access could further disrupt the energy sector, and the future impacts of these transitions on global energy security and sustainable transitions globally remain unclear.
Therefore, now, more than ever, it is critical that policy-makers and business leaders re-evaluate current and future strategies for delivering the domestic and international energy transition. The fourth annual Chatham House Energy Transitions conference will examine the new drivers of change, focusing on how different economies and industries can make the shift to a low-carbon energy future. Key questions to be explored include:
What will incentivize an acceleration in decarbonization and drive low-carbon innovation?
How can new technologies be deployed to transform grid interaction and enhance connectivity?
What are the implications of the changing policy environment for low-carbon investment?
How do disruptive shifts in the energy sector affect the prospects for enhancing access to clean, safe and sustainable energy in developing countries?
The Chatham House Rule
To enable as open a debate as possible, this conference will be held under the Chatham House Rule.
Achieving the Paris Agreement’s goal of limiting temperature increases to ‘well below’ 2°C requires environmental leadership to rapidly emerge within the world’s centres of economic policymaking: treasuries, finance ministries and ministries of economy and business.
Plenary Session at the Waddesdon Club 2018 annual meeting
The urgency of climate change dictates that the next generation of leaders must deliver the economic transformation needed; these individuals need to understand how climate and environment challenges will affect their time in power and define their legacies.
The Waddesdon Club is Chatham House’s response – through engaging future leaders, it seeks to equip them with the necessary tools, concepts, language, and capacities for influence needed to advance a mainstream economic agenda for climate change and sustainable development. Core to this approach is an annual retreat at Waddesdon Manor, offering a unique opportunity for participants to deepen their knowledge; widen their peer network, including meeting leading international experts; and share their respective perceptions, experiences and ideas on climate change issues.~
Previous Waddesdon Club Retreats
The inaugural Waddesdon Club retreat was held in October 2016 with a broad focus on the importance of low-carbon industrial strategies in mobilizing capital for low-carbon investment, driving down technology costs, fostering innovation and phasing out high-emitting activities.
The second Waddesdon Club retreat took place in early 2018, with a discussion on the practical policy challenges of managing the green economy transition. Expert speakers highlighted the role of international institutions in shaping norms, policies and financial flows. Participants addressed the need for a vision that brings together poverty alleviation, tackling inequality and addressing climate change for a just transition amidst rapid decarbonisation.
Achieving the Paris Agreement’s goal of limiting temperature increases requires strong environmental leadership within economic policymaking. In October 2016, Chatham House used the unique setting of Windmill Hill to convene future leaders in finance and economy ministries from across the globe. The self styled ‘Waddesdon Club’ aimed to enhance understanding of climate and environmental challenges and ensure consideration within policy making at the highest level.
Organised by the Energy, Environment and Resources department and the International Economic departments at Chatham House the ‘retreat’ was attended by leading economic policymakers and experts from the fields of climate science, energy and finance. Utilising the inspiration of Windmill Hill, itself a celebration of the conservation and environmental work pursued by the Rothschild Foundation, attendees shared knowledge on the current political and economic context and explored the intersections of environmental and economic policymaking. With the long term aim of supporting economies to respond more effectively to global change, the event identified recommendations for future discussion.
In order to enhance attendees’ experience and support effective communication, a dedicated mobile app was developed for the event. Co-created by Chatham House and digital tool provider, Lumi, the app allowed real-time updates and feedback as well as being an on-going resource which supports the implementation of ideas discussed at the event.
Chatham House plan to continue the momentum built through the first Waddesdon Club with future events at Windmill Hill.
“Quantum Physics is a fairy tale! Like a pretty, perfect looking magical castle in the distance… but when you finally get up close and inside… it’s a dark deceptive trap that you can never escape from!… … And it’s about to collapse!”
From David Harriman’s course “The Philosophic Corruption of Physics,”…
Below is a series of lectures, David Harriman’s series, “The Philosophic Corruption of Physics/Reality.” Herein, he walks us through the history of physics and how the Kantian philosophy subverted the science.
“I love the way this guy pronounces ‘Kant’… it’s like the posh English way of pronouncing…
“Okey dokey Danny Boy!”
“Quite fitting though really!” 😀
“Anyone that knows me personally, knows I am literally like a little boy when it comes to this one! … X-Men comics! Anyone? No? GUESS WHO MY FAVOURITE X-MAN WAS!” 😀
“And still is?”
“GAMBIT! Well… I’m more inclined towards Magnetos Brotherhood these days”
In the 21st century, physicists, mathematicians and theoreticians have turned to supercomputers in their quest for the ‘Unified Theory’ of physics. Supercomputers have been used in every field from cosmology, Astro-physics, particle physics, to the search for the elusive ‘dark matter’ (which Mills has identified as ‘hydrino’). Thus far each effort (as far as I’m aware) has been based on the ‘Standard Model’ of physics, and as of yet produced no concrete results, new theories or confirmation of existing ones (I.e. Standard Model).
Why not use a supercomputer to test Mills’ GUT-CP model of atomic structure, and of the Universe? Mills has almost single handily built an entirely new model of physics, of the atom and electron… and has thus far proven to be far more accurate than the Standard Model and Quantum Mechanics. Millsian software (as discussed previously) is a perfect example of the accuracy of his model in regards to molecular structure and calculating bond energy transfers. GUT-CP has predicted everything from the accelerated expansion of the Universe to recently confirmed ‘gravitational’ waves.
One such effort in the search for ‘dark matter’, ‘new physics’ and the fundamentals of particle physics & cosmology is the GAMBIT Collaboration project. GAMBIT is The Global And Modular BSM Inference Tool, and is made up of a collection of researchers from scientific intuitions worldwide, using the supercomputer Prometheus (amongst others) in the search for dark matter and a unified theory.
GAMBIT narrows the hiding places for ‘new physics’
The Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences “Is it possible for today’s apparatus to detect the elementary particles of ‘new physics’ that are capable of explaining such mysteries as the nature of dark matter or the lack of symmetry between matter and antimatter? To answer this question, scientists from the international GAMBIT (Global and Modular Beyond-the-Standard-Model Inference Tool) Collaboration have developed a set of software tools that comprehensively analyse data collected during the most sophisticated contemporary experiments and measurements.” “Although almost a century has passed since Zwicky’s discovery, it has not been possible to investigate the composition of dark matter to this day, nor even to unambiguously confirm its existence. Over this time, theoreticians have constructed many extensions of the Standard Model containing particles that are to a greater or lesser extent exotic.”
The following article from Physics World explains GAMBIT, the history of the ‘discovery’ of ‘dark matter’ and the subsequent search for it’s identity’. When supercomputers go over to the dark side “Despite oodles of data and plenty of theories, we still don’t know what dark matter is. Martin White and Pat Scott describe how a new software tool called GAMBIT – run on supercomputers such as Prometheus – will test how novel theories stack up when confronted with real data”
“Unexpected scientific paradigm shifts, where reality turns out not to be as we believed, can be just as exciting and perplexing. One such dramatic change in perspective has been the dawning realization over the last few decades that “ordinary” matter accounts for just a fifth of the matter in the universe, with the rest made of a mysterious “dark” matter. Physicists love unsolved problems, and they don’t come much bigger than working out the nature of this dark stuff.
If a blockbuster movie is ever made about the discovery of dark matter, the next decade may well be the climax. New data from experiments such as CERN’s Large Hadron Collider (LHC) are telling us more about what dark matter can and cannot be, while the recent discovery of gravitational waves reminds us that even century-old theories (general relativity in this case) can be spectacularly confirmed in the blink of an eye”
GAMBIT project suggests theoretical particles are too massive for LHC detection “The idea of the GAMBIT Collaboration is to create tools for analyzing data from as many experiments as possible, from different areas of physics, and to compare them very closely with the predictions of new theories. Looking comprehensively, it is possible to narrow the search areas of new physics much faster, and over time also eliminate those models whose predictions have not been confirmed in measurements,” explains Dr. Marcin Chrzaszcz Verification of the new physics proposals takes place in the GAMBIT Collaboration as follows: Scientists choose a theoretical model and build it into the software. The program then scans the values of the main model parameters. For each set of parameters, predictions are calculated and compared to the data from the experiments. “In practice, nothing is trivial here. There are models where we have as many as 128 free parameters. Imagine scanning in a space of 128 dimensions—it’s something that kills every computer. Therefore, at the beginning, we limited ourselves to three versions of simpler supersymmetric models, known under the abbreviations CMSSM, NUHM1 and NUHM2. They have five, six and seven free parameters, respectively. But things nonetheless get complicated, because, for example, we only know some of the other parameters of the Standard Model with a certain accuracy. Therefore, they have to be treated like free parameters too, only changing to a lesser extent than the new physics parameters,” says Dr. Chrzaszcz.
The GAMBIT Project website gives the following explanation – “Welcome to the GAMBIT homepage. GAMBIT is a global fitting code for generic Beyond the Standard Model theories, designed to allow fast and easy definition of new models, observables, likelihoods, scanners and backend physics codes.”
Thus far, ALL previous efforts with GAMBIT and Prometheus have led to dead ends (like all of modern QM physics), but it is worth noting that all previous efforts using Prometheus have been built upon or have expanded upon THE STANDARD MODEL!
What if this code, or at least these supercomputers where used for Mills’ GUT-CP and hydrino model? Entering a theory based upon Classical Laws? Expanding upon Newton, Maxwell equations… essentially used to enter ALL of Mills 30 year research, theories, predictions and equations… tested against known observables in the Universe?
I believe the results of doing so would be extraordinary accurate compared to all previous attempts, and would be the beginning of creating a computer model/simulation of the Universe to such a degree of accuracy never before witnessed in mathematics, particle physics, Astro-physics and cosmology… essentially the beginning of creating a computer simulation of the history of the Universe, past, previous ;o, present and future… A COMPUTER SIMUALTION OF THE HISTORY OF THE UNIVERSE!
(as well as confirming hydrino as dark matter, the expansion/contraction of the Universe, gravitational waves and causes etc.)
Surely if all these Quantum Physicists, Astro-physicists and cosmologists are saying Mills is fundamentally wrong… take a risk and run it on a supercomputer such as Prometheus (fitting name considering!)… take a GAMBIT!
“The intro to the awsomest cartoon ever! I’m going to walk down the aisle to this theme!”
“The application of unlimited, unbounded energy are only constrained by human imagination, ingenuity and ambition” – Dr Randell Mills
Brilliant Light Power Terraforming Application Video
(The music! 😀 … No dolphins? 😦 )
“We need to start terraforming the planet in a positive and beneficial way for the sake of the survival of our species and all life on Earth… because at the moment we’re terraforming Earth like General Zod!… Take California for example, severe drought and water shortages, catastrophic wild fires… … although when those fires reached Rupert Murdoch’s home, I was privately thinking ‘swings and roundabouts!’… … but we could create a global paradise of abundance if we utilised this technology correctly”
Hydrino energy is high density, cheap, non- polluting, safe, and deployable anywhere in the world…
Obviously Brilliant Light Power and hydrino energy has the potential to eradicate the burning of ALL fossil fuels globally, thereby cutting global carbon emissions to ZERO!
Hydrino technology can also replace ‘renewable’ energy sources such as solar and wind farms, which would potentially take up millions of square miles of the Earths landmass to host. There is no radioactive or chemical waste, or any pollution of any kind.
But also Dr Mills and Brilliant Light Power envision a world where the use of ‘hydrino’ technologies will be used to transform the planets most inhospitable wastelands and arid regions into ‘lush, liveable, crop-producing expanses’ whilst ‘also preventing drought in already cultivated areas such as California.’
A recent article unveiled plans by scientists to transform areas of the Sahara into a lush rainfall region with abundant greenery. Although the plan utilises a combination of wind turbines and solar panels, it highlights the possible ways in which future clean technologies will be used to positively alter and transform the Earths landscape.
I believe much more research should be conducted and careful consideration taken into the idea of transforming certain regions of the Earth, using hydrino power only. As pointed out in following article, transforming such areas as the Sahara may have unintended consequences for other regions such as the Amazon rainforest, and Atlantic ocean marine life… 8 Craziest Mega-Engineering Projects That Could Rework Earth “For one, sand from the Sahara is carried into the air, across the Atlantic, and deposited in South America. The rich dust that falls from the sky, and the rain storms caused by that dust picking up moisture during it’s transoceanic journey both fertilize the Amazon rain forest. No desert, no dust. No dust, no rain forest. During that journey, the dust also feeds a variety of sea life.”
Brett Holverstott mentions in his talk, in regards to how hydrino energy has the potential to help alleviate, if not eradicate :-
Ice cap melting
The dying of marine life
Being deployable in the third world
The cutting down of the Amazon rainforest
Global city smog
Construction of river dams
… amongst numerous other potential environmental benefits.
I also believe our new understanding of atomic structure and molecular physics (Millsian), could pave the way for new cleaner technologies and sustainable materials in industries other than energy. These may include :-
– Plastics and materials
– Food and crop growth
– Fertilisers and agriculture
– Mining and mineral extraction
– Methods for cleaning up past environmental damage (plastics, carbon emissions, nuclear and toxic waste), essentially reversing the damage already caused by the Industrial Revolution.
“The application of unlimited, unbounded energy are only constrained by human imagination, ingenuity and ambition” – Dr Randell Mills
“Before we venture out into the stars, looking to terraform other planets… maybe we should take a look back at our own and try and reverse the damage we’ve done here” – Danny Hurley
Robert Senftleben: Terraforming Planet Earth
Large parts of the surface of our planet have been devastated by human activity. Terraforming on a human scale is needed to bring these landscapes back to life. The knowledge and technology is there, and you can learn how to use it and participate.
EXCELLENT TED TALK!
How to green the world’s deserts and reverse climate change | Allan Savory
“Desertification is a fancy word for land that is turning to desert,” begins Allan Savory in this quietly powerful talk. And terrifyingly, it’s happening to about two-thirds of the world’s grasslands, accelerating climate change and causing traditional grazing societies to descend into social chaos. Savory has devoted his life to stopping it. He now believes — and his work so far shows — that a surprising factor can protect grasslands and even reclaim degraded land that was once desert.
Update (13/09/2-18) ;D Gaia 2.0 (Timothy M. Lenton, Bruno Latour – University of Exeter)
“A time-honoured theory into why conditions on Earth have remained stable enough for life to evolve over billions of years has been given a new, innovative twist.
For around half a century, the ‘Gaia’ hypothesis has provided a unique way of understanding how life has persisted on Earth. It champions the idea that living organisms and their inorganic surroundings evolved together as a single, self-regulating system that has kept the planet habitable for life—despite threats such as a brightening Sun, volcanoes and meteorite strikes. However, Professor Tim Lenton from the University of Exeter and famed French sociologist of science Professor Bruno Latour are now arguing that humans have the potential to ‘upgrade’ this planetary operating system to create “Gaia 2.0”. They believe that the evolution of both humans and their technology could add a new level of “self-awareness” to Earth’s self-regulation, which is at the heart of the original Gaia theory. As humans become more aware of the global consequences of their actions, including climate change, a new kind of deliberate self-regulation becomes possible where we limit our impacts on the planet. Professors Lenton and Latour suggest that this “conscience choice” to self-regulate introduces a “fundamental new state of Gaia—which could help us achieve greater global sustainability in the future. However, such self-aware self-regulation relies on our ability to continually monitor and model the state of the planet and our effects upon it. Professor Lenton, Director of Exeter’s new Global Systems Institute, said: “If we are to create a better world for the growing human population this century then we need to regulate our impacts on our life support-system, and deliberately create a more circular economy that relies—like the biosphere—on the recycling of materials powered by sustainable energy.” The original Gaia Theory was developed in the late 1960’s by James Lovelock, a British scientist and inventor. It suggested that both the organic and inorganic components of Earth evolved together as one single, self-regulating system which can control global temperature and atmospheric composition to maintain its own habitability. The new perspective article is published in leading journal Science on September 14, 2018. It follows recent research, led by Professor Lenton, which offered a fresh solution to how the Gaia hypothesis works in real terms: Stability comes from “sequential selection” in which situations where life destabilises the environment tend to be short-lived and result in further change until a stable situation emerges, which then tends to persist. Once this happens, the system has more time to acquire further properties that help to stabilise and maintain it—a process known as “selection by survival alone”. Creating transformative solutions to the global changes that humans are now causing is a key focus of the University of Exeter’s new Global Systems Institute.”
“I actually emailed Roger Penrose with this last year.”
“Did you get a response?”
“No… but then he is ‘Sir’ Roger Penrose, and what we know of the Queens Knighthood list, is it reads like a God damn sex offen..
“Drop it Danny Boy!”
Recent observations made by both the Planck observatory and the BICEP2 South Pole telescope, indicate possible remnants of a previous Universe. This possible indication has been interpreted by a number of physicists in different ways, but Roger Penrose of Oxford University believes what is being seen in the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data, are radioactive swirls dubbed ‘Hawking Holes’, thus being proof of a previous Universe existing prior to this present one, in what he and his colleagues call the “conformal cyclic cosmology” (CCC).
(It is worth noting these conclusions are drawn mainly from the data from the Planck observatory, and raw data from the BICEP2 is still to be released)
Radioactive swirls in the cosmos may rewrite the origin story of the universe “The idea is called “conformal cyclic cosmology” (CCC), and what it asserts is that, rather than starting from a big bang, the universe continually expands and contracts, each time leaving behind tiny bits of electromagnetic radiation that remain as the process occurs over and over. The late Stephen Hawking predicted tiny dots of radiation, which others call ‘Hawking points’, left over from this cycle.”
These Swirls of Light Could Be Signs of a Previous Universe Existing Before Ours “Penrose’s CCC model was developed as an answer to a curious imbalance between measurements of our early Universe’s temperature and the state of order we might expect. According to him, this imbalance could be accounted for by the death of a pre-existing universe that was there before the Big Bang. Oscillating universes come in a few different forms, depending on your choice of model. Some suggest the Universe is destined to fall back in itself one day.”
This observation, and it’s interpretation caught my attention, because according to Mills’ GUT-CP, we live in an ‘Oscillating Universe’, eternally expanding and contracting over a period of a trillion years or so (give or take). According to Mills, the Universe is in a continual state of expansion from 9 billion light years to 312 billion light years, and then contraction phase back (every 450 billion years). This process happens because, during expansion phase (or ‘annihilation’), matter is converted directly into energy (through various ‘hydrino’ chemical and nuclear processes throughout the Universe, including our own Sun), which causes spacetime to expand everywhere throughout the Universe.
NOTE – Dr Randell Mills successfully predicted the acceleration of the expanding Universe in his model prior to it’s discovery. He was also the first to successfully predict gravitational waves in to his model.
After the Universe has expanded to it’s peak radius (312 billion light years), and the engines of the expansion phase have ‘run out’ so to speak (stars, supernovas, neutron stars etc.), and most of the Universes matter has been converted into energy… the Universe will then begin it’s contraction phase and the process is reversed. Radiation will create particles, which in turn create atoms, converting ‘dark energy’ into matter, thus contracting spacetime everywhere throughout the Universe.
“The conversion of matter into energy causes spacetime, and thus the universe, to expand, since light has inertial but no gravitational mass. The acceleration of the expansion of the presently observed universe was predicted by Mills in 1995 and has since been confirmed experimentally. Mills predicts that the universe expands and contracts over thousand-billion year cycles.” – Brilliant Light Power
It is important to note that The Big Bang Theory is just that… a theory, and no direct evidence for it has ever been put forward. The idea was based upon the fact that the Universe was expanding (prior to knowledge of it’s acceleration, which should in turn discount the theory). Many physicists and cosmologists throughout the 20th century questioned the theory, and by early 21st century a vast array of evidence has slowly accumulated to discount it.
– Reiss 1998. Hubble date showed that the Universe was NOT decelerating as predicted by the Big Bang Theory, but actually accelerating. Unknown to most in science, Mills had successfully predicted this two years prior in GUT-CP model. (this is when the idea of ‘dark’ matter’ came to the forefront of physics in order to account for this surprising observation).
– Space Circles Are Proof of a Pre-Big Bang Universe? (2010) Recycled-universe theory “works on paper,” but details missing, critics say.– 3 Theories That Might Blow Up the Big Bang (Steinhardt and Turok) “Steinhardt and Turok—working closely with a few like-minded colleagues—have now developed these insights into a thorough alternative to the prevailing, Genesis-like view of cosmology. According to the Big Bang theory, the whole universe emerged during a single moment some 13.7 billion years ago. In the competing theory, our universe generates and regenerates itself in an endless cycle of creation. The latest version of the cyclic model even matches key pieces of observational evidence supporting the older view.”
“We weren’t looking for cycles,” Steinhardt says, “but the model naturally produces them.” After a collision, energy gives rise to matter in the brane worlds. The matter then evolves into the kind of universe we know: galaxies, stars, planets, the works. Space within the branes expands, and at first the distance between the branes (in the bulk) grows too. When the brane worlds expand so much that their space is nearly empty, however, attractive forces between the branes draw the world-sheets together again. A new collision occurs, and a new cycle of creation begins. In this model, each round of existence—each cycle from one collision to the next—stretches about a trillion years. By that reckoning, our universe is still in its infancy, being only 0.1 percent of the way through the current cycle.The cyclic universe directly solves the problem of before. With an infinity of Big Bangs, time stretches into forever in both directions. “The Big Bang was not the beginning of space and time,” Steinhardt says. “There was a before, and before matters because it leaves an imprint on what happens in the next cycle.”
– As Holverstott states in ‘Randell Mills and the search for Hydrino energy’, numerous ‘ancient’ structures are being discovered throughout the Cosmos that seem to predate the accepted 13.6 billion years ‘beginning’.
~Including a ‘quasar that is 13 billion light years away, yet powered by a black hole about 2 billion times the mass of the Sun’ (Mortlock 2011).
~A star smaller than our own Sun, which has almost no trace of elements heavier than hydrogen or helium, with a ratio of helium lower than that theoretically created in the big bang. Dubbed ‘The Star That Should Not Exist’(which is so sweet! :D)
– More recently a gargantuan black hole found in 2013, again throws doubt upon the notion of nothing in our ‘known’ Universe existing prior. I believe many more objects and structures will be found in the coming years and decades that will support Mils’ GUT-CP and his ‘Oscillating Universe’ Model.
– Young black hole had monstrous growth spurt Super-massive object found in early Universe tests theories of cosmic evolution. “A black hole that grew to gargantuan size in the Universe’s first billion years is by far the largest yet spotted from such an early date, researchers have announced. The object, discovered by astronomers in 2013, is 12 billion times as massive as the Sun, and six times greater than its largest-known contemporaries. Its existence poses a challenge for theories of the evolution of black holes, stars and galaxies, astronomers say.”
Mills model of an Oscillating Universe is NOT to be confused with other models such as the Big Bounce or CCC, which are still based in Quantum Models such as string or M theory… this is a truly original, more eloquent and simpler model, that has been arrived at through a classical understanding of atomic structure and gravitational forces (i.e hydrino model).
For further details see… Summary Of Randell Mills’s Unified Theory (Holverstott)
“yeah there’s an issue with hydrino compounds alright… A BIG ONE!… and it’s not that they don’t exist!”
A new definition for “chemical element”?
Any field of science needs high degrees of standardization, appropriate and specific language, order, and clarity. Therefore, definitionsof the basics are necessary. However, Nature is extremely complex, and realityhas so many facets that unequivocal, comprehensive,scientifically sustainable definitions are rarely possible. On the contrary, there appears to be a Heisenberg-type relationship between the importance and the definability of concepts. Fundamental ones, such as space, time, matter, and energy, cannot be actually defined; and essential human features such as knowledge, intelligence, and creativity, each has several incomplete definitions.
In chemistry, acidity, basicity, electronegativity, aromaticity, and so forth are useful but “fuzzy” concepts. Definitions of terms like these can limit and sometimes even mutilate the integrity of these concepts. The great Polish author of aphorisms, S. J. Lec, has remarked, “Definition and finis [death] have the same Latin root” (1). Richness of a concept is sacrificed for the sake of brevity. Obsolete definitions can hampercreativity and progress in a field of research.
A chemical element is currently defined as “a type of matter composed of atoms that all have exactly the same positive charge of their nuclei”, that is, the same atomic number (2). This definition works and is perfectly justified, but it is a physical definition. Chemistry is about reactivity, bonds, structures, and properties, all of which depend on the electronsthatsurround the nuclei and on specific electronic configurations. Chemical events happen with electrons. Quantum mechanics has just added to the complexity of chemistrybut does not change anything. As long it is certainthat any atomic number imposes one and only one electron configuration, the physical and chemical definitions are equivalent. Along the same line of thinking, it seems that the periodic table of the elements is definitive, and the short-lived synthetic elements cannot introduce new chemical data. However, even a singleexception to the equivalence of the definitions could open new vistas to chemistry. Until recently, this seemed to be simply impossible.
Hydrogen atoms with variable “orbitalities” It is well known that the simplest atom, hydrogen, has a fundamental ground state, and this is believed to be unique and indisputable. An American researcher,Randell Mills, has a different opinion. In 1986, he began to develop a general theory based on fundamental natural laws, and he has questioned quantum mechanics. It is far beyond the scope of this article to present this impressive intellectual construct. It has not yet been accepted by mainstream physicists, but it has been described in papers and supported by many kinds of experiments. Extensive information can be found on the Web site of Mills’s company, BlackLight Power Inc. (Cranbury, NJ) (3).
Mills has predicted and demonstrated the possibility that hydrogen atoms can be induced catalytically to collapse to energy states lower than the ground state, corresponding to fractional quantum numbers. Usable energy is released; it’s not “free”, but it is much more intense than that produced by burning hydrogen. The collapsed hydrogen atom—for which he coined the name “hydrino”, or “tiny hydrogen”—can react with one electron to form a hydride ion. Hydride reacts with other elements, forming a variety of new compounds with interesting and novel properties. Mills and his collaborators have described and characterized a few of them (4–8), but the possibilities seem limitless. Mills calls his work “a new field of hydrogen chemistry”, but I am not convinced that this is the best description.
Chemical elements currently are characterized by their isotopicity (9)—their ability to exist with different numbers of neutrons. Mills’s discovery has generated a new concept: “orbitality”. Thus, atomic hydrogen, deuterium, and tritium differ in their isotopicity, but hydrogen and the hydrino differ in their orbitality: For the same nucleus, they have different electron cloud configurations. For a chemist, it may appear obvious that orbitality is much more significant and chemically differentiating than isotopicity.
The elements of the periodic table have reactivities and other properties determined by their orbitality. Surprisingly, it now appears that at least one element—it happens that it is the simplest and most abundant in the universe—has many kinds of orbitalities, one for each fractional quantum state, that function as different elements.
The definition of “element” is being brought into question. Originally, it meant a building block of Nature, but now a new category has appeared. A myriad applications will be created; and orbitality may be a complex subject, good for many papers and theses. We must answer the questions: Are hydrogen and the hydrino still one and the same element? What will happen if heavier elements with different orbitalities are synthesized?
The strange birth of a new chemical element Mills’s discoveries have created a complicated and controversial situation. On one hand, he continues to publish more and more experimental data proving the creation and existence of the hydrino. Some examples:
Hydrinos produce excess heat caused bythe shrinkage of hydrogen atoms released in electrolysis and vapor-phase catalysis experiments, and the Mills theory predicts well which elements work as catalysts.
Hydrinos create a hydrogen plasma under extremely mild conditions (e.g., at 1/100 of the theoretical voltage and with 1/4000–1/7000 the power input of noncatalytic controls).
Many compounds of hydrino hydrides with unexpected properties, not predicted by the current theory, have been synthesized. For example, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy reveals protons tightly shielded by electrons orbiting close to them.
On the other hand,nopapers in peer-reviewed journals confirm or refute Mills’s ideas and results. The standard treatment is to ignore his results and to replace scientific arguments with stock answers (10) or by association with “cold fusion”, which is an entirely different subject.
It is interesting that, independently of Mills, a small English group has also concluded that lower, fractional energy states of hydrogen exist in the framework of quantum mechanics (11). But they do not speak about new compounds or use the process for generation of energy.
However, this story is about the future of chemistry and chemical engineering, and there is only one way to decide. The samples (e.g., those with the general formula MH*X, where M is a metal, X is a halide, and H* is a hydrino ion) provided by BlackLight Power must be analyzed and conclusions drawn. In the worst case, the theory will be disproved; in the best case (for chemistry), the periodic table will be enriched with one or more elements. Future science will decide, and perhaps the first new chemical quasi-element will be named millsium.
The goal of this article is simply to stimulate an immediate response from scientists. Chemists of the world, analyze those compounds and decide!
Lec, S. J. Mysli nieuczane (Uncombed Thoughts); Oficyna Literacka Noir sur Blanc Sp.: Warsaw, Poland, 1996; vol 3 (in Polish).
IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd ed.;International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry:Research Triangle Park, NC, 1997; www.iupac.org/goldbook/C01022.pdf (accessed October 2001).
Mills R. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2000, 25, 669–683.
Mills R.; Dhandapani, B.; Greenig, N.; He, J. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2000, 25, 1185–1203.
Mills R.; Dhandapani, B.; Nansteel, H.; He, J.; Shannon, T.; Echezuria, A. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2001, 26, 339–367.
Mills, R.; Good, W. R.; Phillips, J.; Popov, A. I. U.S. Patent 6,024,935, 2000.
Mills R.; Dhandapani, B.; Nansteel, H.; He, J.; Voigt, A. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2001, 26, 965–979.
Berezin, A. A. Interdiscipl. Sci. Rev. 1992, 17 (1), 74–80.
Vijh, A. K. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2001, 26, 281.
Davies, C. J.; Davies, C. J.; Beith, R.M.V.; Eccles, C. R. World Patent 00 25320, 2000.
Peter Gluck (email@example.com) retired in 1999 after a 40-year career in the Romanian chemical industry. He is currently a senior consultant and Web searcher for Dynamic Network Technologies, an Internet service provider in Cluj, Romania.
“Exoteric Christians can fuck off and stay undead (lucky if we don’t unleash a holy war on them this century)… we want something esoteric Christians can admire! 🙂 Something Occultists can decode.
Sun worship! The dawning of the Age of Aquarius… perhaps if you want to go ultra modern, something to symbolise the SunCell! ;D … okay, but the bringing of the sun down to planet Earth. (Norman Foster… we’re looking at you here brother)
A phoenix rising from the ashes?
Do something with the roof space… I’m suggesting psychedelic (not too psychedelic obviously!)… but something to symbolise the raising of consciousness through mystical psychedelic experiences… it’s influence on religious history. … … And something to pay homage to our reptilian overlords of course! :D… wait… our ANCIENT ALIEN ANCESTORS! (okay I’m being silly… but everything else!)
The competition to repair the Paris cathedral will attract global interest. Architects give their views
It is less than a week since the fire at Notre Dame Cathedral and the response has swung from global grief at an architectural tragedy, to relief that the damage was not as extensive as it could have been, and on to matters of reconstruction. President Emmanuel Macron has announced that the 13th-century landmark will be rebuilt within five years, “even more beautifully”.
Macron’s words accompanied the announcement of an international competition to design a new spire and roof structure – boosted by €1bn of private donations pledged so far. The prime minister, Édouard Philippe, said they hoped for “a new spire adapted to the techniques and the challenges of our era”.
What might that mean? Among other things, a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for architects and designers. The 90-metre (300ft) spire was one of the most familiar landmarks on the city’s relatively low-rise skyline. Added in the 1850s by Eugène Viollet-le-Duc, it was itself a replacement for the original 13th-century spire, which had become so battered it was removed in 1786. A new spire will be more prominent still. But what should, or could, a new addition look like?
Norman Foster, founder and chairman, Foster and Partners
Notre Dame Cathedral is the ultimate high technology monument of its day in terms of Gothic engineering. Like many cathedrals, its history is one of change and renewal. Over the centuries, the roofs of medieval cathedrals have been ravaged by fires and replaced: for example, Chartres in 1194 and 1836, Metz in 1877. In every case, the replacement used the most advanced building technology of the age – it never replicated the original. In Chartres, the 12th-century timbers were replaced in the 19th century by a new structure of cast iron and copper. The decision to hold a competition for the rebuilding of Notre Dame is to be applauded because it is an acknowledgement of that tradition of new interventions.
As an aside, the roof that has been destroyed had wooden frames – each was made from an individual oak tree – 1,300 in total. Hence its nickname, “the Forest”. It was rarely visited so, surely, this is an opportunity to recreate a once-hidden – and now destroyed – timber structure with a modern, fireproof, lightweight replacement. The ideal outcome would be a respectful combination of the dominant old with the best of the new.
I suppose people are saying now it’s burnt down, you’ve got to put in something contemporary. Bollocks! It is not a building, it’s a cultural artefact. It’s a symbol of Frenchness. Architects get this silly idea that because technology changes, therefore architecture always ought to reflect those changes. But culture – how we think of ourselves, how we identify ourselves – does not move quickly; it moves very, very slowly in fact. And to confuse these two things is a serious mistake.
They should do what they did at York [Minster, which suffered a similar fire in 1984] and put it back so that people wouldn’t actually notice. There is this crazy idea that any replacement or new work should have a “contemporary stamp”, and this is generally interpreted to mean things need to look different in order to show people that they are modern, because it would be terrible if people were confused. Well, I don’t see why it’s so terrible. Who are you actually catering for? Are you catering for the most stupid, visually illiterate person? In which case you have to make it look so obviously unlike what was done before that they couldn’t possibly make a mistake. Or if you are an expert and you go to York Minster you will know straight away what is new.
To apply ridiculous modernist theory to this would be so culturally disruptive as to be damaging.
Martin Ashley, conservation architect specialising in historic buildings.
Would it be possible to rebuild Notre Dame’s spire exactly as it was? In theory, yes. Being a spire, it’s quite a complicated structure, but I imagine it was pretty well recorded in various digital and photographic surveys. As to whether the craft skills exist to do it? Yes, absolutely. The carpentry, the metalwork, the roof cladding is all achievable again.
But in a way, restoration is a form of destruction. In restoring buildings, you destroy the history that has gone before. What the people of Paris should now do is something of this time and this culture, and adds a new chapter to that chronology which is enshrined within the historic building fabric of the cathedral. It is an opportunity to do something which is deeply contextual, very dignified, very appropriate, very spiritual, but different.
Amanda Levete, founder and director, AL_A
History never stands still. Notre Dame took centuries to build. The fire is now a part of that history. In a sense the identity of Notre Dame is more located in the two towers, the rose windows, the gargoyles – and therefore the spire is a natural position for something that is expressive and symbolic of something else.
The question is, what is the expression of who we are now? Or who the French people are now? What does it represent? Who is it for? Notre Dame was built at a time when the church was the state, and it’s clearly not now. This building belongs to France, it’s the soul of France, faith or no faith.
With our extension to the Victoria & Albert Museum we took a radical view in terms of what we proposed. We had a responsibility to protect the building’s heritage but on the other hand to breathe new life into it and keep it relevant. That power of difference is not a modern idea. We need to be confident of where we are and to celebrate not just the present but to look to the future.
We applaud in the French their relationship to modernity, which has enabled practices like our own to make a contribution there in ways that would probably be more problematic in London, say. The Pompidou Centre was also an open competition. Two young architects [Richard Rogers and Renzo Piano] won that and it changed their lives.
Seeing those images of the cathedral with no roof also reminded me of Coventry Cathedral: there was something extraordinary about having sight of the sky. I think today you could do something very light and transparent with the roof, which would have its own potency. All kinds of qualities would emerge.
Whatever is built, there has to have incredible lightness, an incredible economy of means, so doing something with almost no material, which is very much the challenge of our age, even in the broader sense of frugality and resource scarcity – but also to have a luminosity to it. It needs to be a kind of beacon.
Everybody will be focused on “what’s the new spire going to be?” But actually we really must try to focus on conserving what’s already there first of all. We don’t want to lose the original Gothic vaulting inside. That then leads to what the roof space is used for. It’s a great big void in the upper storey of the cathedral and the question to my mind is, is there anything ingenious that could be done with it?
Then finally we’re left with the whole question about the spire. To me, it’s a slightly deeper question than putting something in and making it a statement of modern thought; I think it’s also tied to the functionality of that roof void. You could make something rather amazing in there that explains the whole story of the fire and reveals something about the Gothic vaults.
“A bunch of borderline retarded, barely literate, fucking monkeys (white monkeys)… are one step ahead of the UK police!”
“To be honest… I don’t see much of a threat… compared the absolute first class psychos you get in the French Legion, from Poland, Serbia, Ukraine… these lot are a bunch of Teletubbies!”
Spot the difference!
“If and/or when they become a threat to Jewish communities… that’s when I might take an interest”
(If I ever have intelligence of them planning to… say… ‘bomb Parliament’… do you really think I’m going to say anything! 😀 “MOST LIKELY BE YOU WHO SUGGESTED IT!” “Fucking arm them, finance them and train them! :D)
Security services ‘don’t know where threat is coming from’, says charity Hope Not Hate
The UK’s police and security services remain dangerously ill-equipped to identify and counter the long-term terrorism threat from a new wave of far-right politics, according to researchers who helped head off a plot to assassinate a Labour MP.
The anti-racism charity Hope not Hate was instrumental in foiling a plan to murder the West Lancashire MP Rosie Cooper. The legal case at the centre of this plot came to a conclusion on Tuesday.
Senior security figures including the head of MI5, Andrew Parker; the head of UK counter-terrorism policing, Neil Basu; and the Metropolitan police commissioner, Cressida Dick, have warned that the far-right threat is growing rapidly.
But Hope Not Hate (HNH), whose mole Robbie Mullen exposed the plot to kill Cooper after he turned against the banned neo-Nazi group National Action (NA), said the security services and police were failing to keep up with potential terrorists.
“They don’t know where the threat is coming from and don’t know where to find it, and then they lump in what they think is a threat from the far left,” said Matthew Collins, head of intelligence at HNH, who was also Mullen’s handler.
After the effective destruction of NA – which was the first far-right group to be banned in Britain since the second world war – HNH warned of the long-term threat from a young generation of violent neo-Nazis who have emerged from splits in the far right.
The charity cited groups such as the Sonnenkrieg (Sun war) Division, which HNH described as the third generation of NA.
“The far-right terror threat has always been there. People in groups like C18 have always had sick dreams and fantasies of killing black and Asian people, but they rarely went and did it because they didn’t want to die themselves or go to prison for a long time,” said Collins.
“That’s why National Action and the Atomwaffen [Nuclear weapons] Division, an American group, have been developing the idea of a ‘white jihad’. That was to persuade and convince people that there was spiritual reason for why they could die or go to prison.”
The police have been slow to grasp such concepts, he added, and have largely still been reliant on tipoffs, 999 calls out of the blue, or terrorists making mistakes.
“Those who are involved in groups like the Sonnenkrieg Division have been meeting on gaming forums and other places. The groups that are picking up where NA left off are smaller and more dangerous. If one gets banned they then pick up the mantle and run with it.”
According to academics, extremist groups are using the resurgence of rightwing politics, particularly online but also on the streets, as friendly territory within which they can act more openly and recruit.
“Globally we are seeing the rise of right populism,” said Jacob Davey, a researcher at ISD Global, which helps to design and implement counter-radicalisation strategies. “We can see more extreme groups pushing and pulling and engaging with these and using this as an opportunity.”
Individuals and groups with hard-right ideologies infiltrate into groups that they see have parallel, but legitimate grievances, he said. “The Football Lads Alliance initially had thousands of people at their demonstrations and I would have hesitated to call that a far-right movement; I think it was a lot of people who were legitimately concerned about terror. But what you see is entry into these groups by the far right.”
Online communities developing around these radical, but comparatively soft rightwing ideologies are also used by more extreme groups as a gateway to direct potential recruits harder material hosted on private chats hosted on WhatsApp, Telegram and Discord servers.
“Social media is crucial to the current expansion of the extreme right,” Davey said. “It’s lowered the barrier to getting involved in the extreme right. Twenty years ago if you were that way inclined … you had to go to a certain pub, you had to go to make your way to a certain rally.
“But also you [were] more publicly aligned with these groups, you might lose your job, you might lose friends or family.”
A shared culture links adherents, rather than loyalty to one particular group, said Paul Jackson, a historian who specialises in the history of fascism. The most extreme coalesce around an ideology – revolutionary ultranationalism or racially driven politics – that rejects liberal democracy, and distinguishes them from rightwing figures such as Nigel Farage or Tommy Robinson.
“This type of neo-Nazism is more intellectual than perhaps you may find within neo-Nazis of the Blood and Honour white power music scene, which used to be the youth culture, but now they are getting on to their 50s and 60s,” Jackson said.
“It likes to see itself as extreme within the wider far-right milieu. National Action would comment disparagingly on the English Defence League and the BNP as dad-like figures who didn’t have the necessary dynamism.”
However, they were more of a “talking shop revelling in the idea of violence” rather than an actual violent extremist cell planning attacks, Jackson said. “The danger is that people on the fringes decide to act by themselves. That’s what we find with people like [Jo Cox’s killer] Thomas Mair or Anders Breivik.”
The number of people referred to the UK government’s counter-extremism programme over concerns about far-right activity has risen by more than a third, recent figures show.
A Home Office spokesperson said: “Our counter-terrorism strategy, Contest, addresses all forms of terrorism and no individual or group is free to spread hate or incite violence. We do not routinely comment on whether organisations are or are not under consideration for proscription.”
Ladies and gents… what I am talking about IS THE GREATEST HUMAN DISCOVERY EVER MADE! (since fire at least, probably wasn’t modern homo sapiens that discovered that one)
Standard QM is completely wrong. The structure of the electron being taught is completely wrong. There is an unlimited, clean, safe and extraordinary source at our fingertips… the power of the sun!
It’s not just that… it’s drug design, drug delivery, genetics and DNA, novel compounds with unexplored properties, electron ‘orbitality’ to be added to the periodic table (possibly 137 for each element)… 137 lower states of the hydrogen atom! The identity of dark matter, 95% of the Universe… a new model of the Universe (Oscillating Universe)… new propulsion methods (Anti gravity, fifth force)…
Possibly a rudimentary understanding of how the Universe gave rise to consciousness (for those more inclined to philosophy and ‘religion’… Kabbalah)… but the theory can be used to develop AI (real AI!)
How did this discovery go unnoticed for almost thirty years? TAKE A FUCKING LOOK AROUND! 😀
The CIA know how big this is… … let’s nick it! 😀 Or at least share it 🙂
$280 trillion global energy industry. Multi trillion dollar industry in pharmaceuticals, medicine, aviation, fucking God knows what else… shit we haven’t even invented or even imagined yet!
Read the following books (read Holverstott three times, reading Stolper for the second time… going to start on The Grand Unified Theory OF Classical Physics properly this summer)…
THIS IS OURS FOR THE FUCKING TAKING! (before the Russians and Chinese wake up to what’s happened!)
Private and public institutions around the world are jostling to create new collaboration agreements with Israeli research bodies in an effort to mine the country’s scientific excellence and innovation.
Research from Israel is driving awesome advances in medicine, healthcare, water management, autonomous vehicles, consumer products, manufacturing, and – well, you name it.
So it’s only natural that many international academic, corporate and government bodies are signing collaboration agreements with Israeli research universities and hospitals.
BINA recently inked research and cooperation deals with the United Nations International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory in Portugal; the University of Jyväskylä in Finland; State Key Laboratory for Modification of Chemicals, Fibers & Polymer Materials at Donghua University in Shanghai, and Hanyang University in Seoul.
“Israel offers a combination of good research and good conditions for partners, and that attracts entities to us,” says BINA Director Prof. Dror Fixler, also a member of the Bar-Ilan Faculty of Engineering and a new fellow of the International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE).
“In order to get big grants for projects, researchers must gather a team of individuals and labs from different places around the globe,” Fixler tells ISRAEL21c.
Bilateral agreements signed by the Israeli government with many countries in Europe and Asia over the last 10 years ease the way for researchers in these countries to find partners in Israel when they need collaborators, he explains.
It is internationally acknowledged that there’s vast innovation to be mined from Israeli research institutions, says Dr. Rafael Beyar, director of Rambam Health Care Campus in Haifa.
The Georgia Institute of Technology’s Global Center for Medical Innovation (GCMI) recently chose Rambam as its partner for a new Biomedical and Digital Health Innovation Center in Atlanta to help Israeli med-tech startups get their products on the US healthcare market.
“Being on the forefront of medical practice on one hand, with tight links to the academic world on the other, and enhanced by the entrepreneurial culture around us, creates many innovations within Israel,” Beyar tells ISRAEL21c.
“This is why collaborations with, for example, Atlanta, are so important. [The idea is] to try and generate an easy path to regulatory approval and clinical adoption of leading new innovations that stem from Israel,” says Beyar, who is also a professor of medicine and biomedical engineering at the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa.
GCMI CEO Tiffany Wilson said Rambam was picked because “Israeli engineering and entrepreneurial expertise regularly translate to medical devices capable of improving patient outcomes while driving the overall cost of care down in many parts of the world, including the United States.”
In addition, the center will apply Technion innovations to the task of making better autonomous vehicles, smart environments, and home and industrial robots using natural language processing, deep learning and hardware optimization for learning algorithms.
“The Technion is the leading university in Israel in the field of artificial intelligence and is one of the top 10 universities in the world in the field,” said Center for Artificial Intelligence Director Prof. Shie Mannor from the Technion’s Faculty of Electrical Engineering.
The Technion and the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot have collaborated on nearly 50 research projects since 2011 with the University of Michigan as part of the Michigan-Israel Partnership for Research and Education program.
The latest projects in this collaboration, funded by $20 million from the D. Dan and Betty Kahn Foundation, are focused on building autonomous robots to assist humans with difficult, repetitive or dangerous jobs; and tools to enhance privacy and accuracy in big-data analytics for precision health.
“In this day and age, international and interdisciplinary collaborations are vital to the future of science and engineering,” said Prof. Boaz Golany from the Technion, adding that the research “will benefit people not only in the US and Israel, but worldwide.”
In 2018, the Technion was invited to join EuroTech Universities, a group of research-based universities working to translate basic research into societal solutions.
The other consortium members are the Technical University of Denmark, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, École Polytechnique, TechniEindhoven University of Technology and Technical University of Munich.
“Technion is a perfect match to join and boost this joint endeavor, given its scientific excellence and vibrant innovation ecosystem,” said Jan Mengelers, president of the EuroTech Universities Alliance, established in 2011. “We are pooling our complementary research strengths and connecting our innovation ecosystems for more impact.”
“We bring the ‘Technion way’ of doing things to this partnership: reaching our goals faster and with fewer resources,” Technion President Prof. Peretz Lavie said.
“The combination with the great strengths of the other members of the alliance, which comprises an elite group of European universities similar to Technion, will help us ensure we are at the forefront of scientific research, benefiting millions worldwide.”
Water, air and healthcare
Many international bodies are thirsty for Israeli expertise in water and health expertise. The past year alone saw significant international activity in these sectors.
Justin R. Ehrenwerth, president and CEO of the Water Institute of the Gulf, said, “Our future generations depend on finding and developing the best possible science. And BGU has done a lot of that. You’ve made the desert bloom. You’ve taught the world that water challenges can be solved.”
On March 31, the joint German-Israeli aeroHEALTH Helmholtz International Lab opened on the Rehovot campus of the Weizmann Institute of Science to research the effects of atmospheric aerosols on human health. The lab was developed by scientists from Weizmann, Helmholtz Zentrum München, and Forschungszentrum and is to run initially for five years.
Biomedicine, neuroscience and environmental sciences are the focus of the new Joint Translational Science and Technology Research Institute recently launched in Shanghai’s Zizhu International Education Park in cooperation with the University of Haifa and East China Normal University.
“We believe that our cooperation with ECNU will lead to groundbreaking studies in applied science, biostatistics, brain research, behavioral research and more,” said Prof. Ron Robin, president of the University of Haifa.
The Regional Alcohol and Drug Abuse Research (RADAR) Center of Ben-Gurion University — recognized by the US National Institute on Drug Abuse for its “contributions to scientific diplomacy through outstanding efforts in international collaborative research” – recently signed a memorandum of understanding with the University of Colorado – Anschutz Medical Campus to promote substance-use research, education, training and exchange.
RADAR works with international governmental agencies including the US Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration, US Agency for International Development (USAID), United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, UN Interregional Crime and Justice Research Initiative, and universities worldwide.
RADAR is starting collaborations with the University of Malta, Chiang Mai University, and universities in Moscow, St. Petersburg and Vladivostok to study attitudes, beliefs and knowledge among medical and allied healthcare students regarding medical cannabis.
The Weizmann Institute of Science and Institut Curie in Paris recently signed an historic partnership to work closely together to improve knowledge in the life sciences, particularly in physics, chemistry and cancer research.
Innovation and entrepreneurship
Israel is, of course, famous for its startup smarts, and some recent academic partnerships leverage that expertise.
IBM’s Alpha Zone partnered with Hadassah University Medical Center of Jerusalem to establish an accelerator for post-seed Israeli startups developing deep-tech solutions and services in digital medicine.
Tel Aviv University was chosen as the only foreign founding partner of a new innovation and entrepreneurship hub in Chicago focusing on research, education and startup creation in the fields of cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, big data and food security.
Tel Aviv University and Yissum, the tech-transfer company of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, are partners with the University of Illinois, University of Chicago and Northwestern University in the new $500 million Discovery Partners Institute, supported by the State of Illinois and the city of Chicago.
Discovery Partners Institute will facilitate academic and industry collaboration, with the initial focus on entrepreneurship, biosciences, computer science including AI, big data and cybersecurity, as well as food and agricultural technologies.
Yissum also is opening centers of international cooperation in Asunción (Paraguay) and Shenzhen (China) to facilitate regional commercialization of early-stage technologies coming out of the university’s research labs. Yissum CEO and President Yaron Daniely said additional international centers of cooperation are in the pipeline.